Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request for Support for RHYX M21-45 Camera Module #3531

Closed
mstsclev opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

Request for Support for RHYX M21-45 Camera Module #3531

mstsclev opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mstsclev
Copy link

mstsclev commented Jan 28, 2025

The Feature

Recently, many sellers, particularly from China, have started shipping the RHYX M21-45 camera module instead of the OV2640. While the two modules look visually similar, the RHYX M21-45 does not support JPEG output, causing compatibility issues.

On the Arduino forums, a suggested workaround involves changing the image processing method from:
config.pixel_format = PIXFORMAT_JPEG;
to:
config.pixel_format = PIXFORMAT_RGB565;

Would it be possible to add support for this camera in the library? Or are there hardware limitations that make this infeasible?

Unfortunately, I bought five of these modules and now face this unexpected challenge due to the seller.

Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to your advice or a potential solution!

Image

@mstsclev mstsclev added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 28, 2025
@SybexX
Copy link
Collaborator

SybexX commented Jan 28, 2025

The same as: #3529 (comment)

Request your money back from the sellers, I also made it and he paid me back without hesitation.
I wanted to try to implement this camera, but it does not support many functions and therefore it is not useful.

@caco3 caco3 closed this as completed Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants