Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing rf edges when minimising may lead to missed executions #14

Open
johnwickerson opened this issue Nov 29, 2017 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@johnwickerson
Copy link
Owner

If the execution involves the following thread

    a:W x 1 -po-> b:W x 2 -po-> c:R x 2

(plus some other threads to make the execution inconsistent), and b is removed, then we end up with

    a:W x 1 -po-> c:R x 0

which is certainly inconsistent. This means that the original execution will not be considered minimally inconsistent. Need to consider extending rf with co.rf in rf. Or else leave rf edges unconstrained after removal.

@johnwickerson johnwickerson self-assigned this Nov 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant