From ab57ef3a6a11ba9ab9ead5dad7376d94f96afc96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:42:50 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Editorial: tweak syntax in algorithms

(PR #1644 and PR #1646)
---
 spec.html | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/spec.html b/spec.html
index 621e3fd8dfc..918d427c681 100644
--- a/spec.html
+++ b/spec.html
@@ -13675,14 +13675,14 @@ <h1>Runtime Semantics: Evaluation</h1>
         <emu-alg>
           1. Let _baseReference_ be the result of evaluating |CallExpression|.
           1. Let _baseValue_ be ? GetValue(_baseReference_).
-          1. If the code matched by this |CallExpression| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*, else let _strict_ be *false*.
+          1. If the code matched by this |CallExpression| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*; else let _strict_ be *false*.
           1. Return ? EvaluatePropertyAccessWithExpressionKey(_baseValue_, |Expression|, _strict_).
         </emu-alg>
         <emu-grammar>CallExpression : CallExpression `.` IdentifierName</emu-grammar>
         <emu-alg>
           1. Let _baseReference_ be the result of evaluating |CallExpression|.
           1. Let _baseValue_ be ? GetValue(_baseReference_).
-          1. If the code matched by this |CallExpression| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*, else let _strict_ be *false*.
+          1. If the code matched by this |CallExpression| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*; else let _strict_ be *false*.
           1. Return ? EvaluatePropertyAccessWithIdentifierKey(_baseValue_, |IdentifierName|, _strict_).
         </emu-alg>
       </emu-clause>
@@ -13703,7 +13703,7 @@ <h1>Runtime Semantics: EvaluatePropertyAccessWithExpressionKey ( _baseValue_, _e
       <h1>Runtime Semantics: EvaluatePropertyAccessWithIdentifierKey ( _baseValue_, _identifierName_, _strict_ )</h1>
       <p>The abstract operation EvaluatePropertyAccessWithIdentifierKey takes as arguments a value _baseValue_, a Parse Node _identifierName_, and a Boolean argument _strict_. It performs the following steps:</p>
       <emu-alg>
-        1. Assert: _identifierName_ is an |IdentifierName|
+        1. Assert: _identifierName_ is an |IdentifierName|.
         1. Let _bv_ be ? RequireObjectCoercible(_baseValue_).
         1. Let _propertyNameString_ be StringValue of _identifierName_.
         1. Return a value of type Reference whose base value component is _bv_, whose referenced name component is _propertyNameString_, and whose strict reference flag is _strict_.
@@ -13967,12 +13967,12 @@ <h1>Runtime Semantics: ChainEvaluation</h1>
         </emu-alg>
         <emu-grammar>OptionalChain : `?.` `[` Expression `]`</emu-grammar>
         <emu-alg>
-          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*, else let _strict_ be *false*.
+          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*; else let _strict_ be *false*.
           1. Return ? EvaluatePropertyAccessWithExpressionKey(_baseValue_, |Expression|, _strict_).
         </emu-alg>
         <emu-grammar>OptionalChain : `?.` IdentifierName</emu-grammar>
         <emu-alg>
-          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*, else let _strict_ be *false*.
+          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*; else let _strict_ be *false*.
           1. Return ? EvaluatePropertyAccessWithIdentifierKey(_baseValue_, |IdentifierName|, _strict_).
         </emu-alg>
         <emu-grammar>OptionalChain : OptionalChain Arguments</emu-grammar>
@@ -13989,7 +13989,7 @@ <h1>Runtime Semantics: ChainEvaluation</h1>
           1. Let _optionalChain_ be |OptionalChain|.
           1. Let _newReference_ be ? ChainEvaluation of _optionalChain_ with arguments _baseValue_ and _baseReference_.
           1. Let _newValue_ be ? GetValue(_newReference_).
-          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*, else let _strict_ be *false*.
+          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*; else let _strict_ be *false*.
           1. Return ? EvaluatePropertyAccessWithExpressionKey(_newValue_, |Expression|, _strict_).
         </emu-alg>
         <emu-grammar>OptionalChain : OptionalChain `.` IdentifierName</emu-grammar>
@@ -13997,7 +13997,7 @@ <h1>Runtime Semantics: ChainEvaluation</h1>
           1. Let _optionalChain_ be |OptionalChain|.
           1. Let _newReference_ be ? ChainEvaluation of _optionalChain_ with arguments _baseValue_ and _baseReference_.
           1. Let _newValue_ be ? GetValue(_newReference_).
-          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*, else let _strict_ be *false*.
+          1. If the code matched by this |OptionalChain| is strict mode code, let _strict_ be *true*; else let _strict_ be *false*.
           1. Return ? EvaluatePropertyAccessWithIdentifierKey(_newValue_, |IdentifierName|, _strict_).
         </emu-alg>
       </emu-clause>
@@ -15194,7 +15194,7 @@ <h1>Runtime Semantics: Evaluation</h1>
       <emu-alg>
         1. Let _lref_ be the result of evaluating |CoalesceExpressionHead|.
         1. Let _lval_ be ? GetValue(_lref_).
-        1. If _lval_ is *undefined* or *null*,
+        1. If _lval_ is *undefined* or *null*, then
           1. Let _rref_ be the result of evaluating |BitwiseORExpression|.
           1. Return ? GetValue(_rref_).
         1. Otherwise, return _lval_.