From opening a bug report to creating a pull request: every contribution is appreciated and welcome. If you're planning to implement a new feature or change the api please create an issue first. This way we can ensure that your precious work is not in vain.
Most of the time, if webpack is not working correctly for you it is a simple configuration issue.
If you are having difficulty, please search the StackOverflow with the webpack tag for questions related
to the karma-webpack
. If you can find an answer to your issue, please post a question in StackOverflow or
the webpack Gitter and include both your webpack, karma & karma-webpack versions.
If you have discovered a bug or have a feature suggestion, feel free to create an issue on Github.
git clone https://github.com/webpack/karma-webpack.git
cd karma-webpack
npm install
To run the entire test suite use:
npm test
After getting some feedback, push to your fork and submit a pull request. We may suggest some changes or improvements or alternatives, but for small changes your pull request should be accepted quickly.
Some things that will increase the chance that your pull request is accepted:
- Write tests
- Follow the existing Webpack coding style defined in the eslint and editor config rules.
We use conventional changelog & the commitizen adapter to generate our release notes using Angular's commit message convention.
This requires commitizen to be installed globally.
npm install commitizen -g
- Now, simply use
git cz
instead ofgit commit
when committing.
If you're not working in a Commitizen friendly repository, then git cz
will work just the same as git commit
.
Each commit message consists of a header, a body and a footer. The header has a special format that includes a type, a scope and a subject:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<BLANK LINE>
<body>
<BLANK LINE>
<footer>
The header is mandatory and the scope of the header is optional.
Any line of the commit message cannot be longer 100 characters! This allows the message to be easier to read on GitHub as well as in various git tools.
If the commit reverts a previous commit, it should begin with revert:
, followed by the header of
the reverted commit. In the body it should say: This reverts commit <hash>.
, where the hash is
the SHA of the commit being reverted.
Must be one of the following:
- feat: A new feature
- fix: A bug fix
- docs: Documentation only changes
- style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, extra semi-colons, etc)
- refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
- perf: A code change that improves performance
- test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
- build: Changes that affect the build system, CI configuration or external dependencies
- chore: Other changes that don't modify
src
ortest
files
The scope could be anything specifying place of the commit change. For example
datepicker
, dialog
, etc.
The subject contains succinct description of the change:
- use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
- don't capitalize first letter
- no dot (.) at the end
Just as in the subject, use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes". The body should include the motivation for the change and contrast this with previous behavior.
The footer should contain any information about Breaking Changes and is also the place to reference GitHub issues that this commit Closes.
Breaking Changes should start with the word BREAKING CHANGE:
with a space or two newlines.
The rest of the commit message is then used for this.
A detailed explanation can be found in this google document.