You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello 🦀 ,
we (Rust group @sslab-gatech) found a memory-safety/soundness issue in this crate while scanning Rust code on crates.io for potential vulnerabilities.
preamble_skipcount method creates an uninitialized buffer (buffer) and passes it to user-provided Read implementation. This is unsound, because it allows safe Rust code to exhibit an undefined behavior (read from uninitialized memory).
This part from the Read trait documentation explains the issue:
It is your responsibility to make sure that buf is initialized before calling read. Calling read with an uninitialized buf (of the kind one obtains via MaybeUninit<T>) is not safe, and can lead to undefined behavior.
Suggested Fix
It is safe to zero-initialize the newly allocated u8 buffer before read(), in order to prevent user-provided Read from accessing old contents of the newly allocated heap memory.
Thank you for checking out this issue 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello 🦀 ,
we (Rust group @sslab-gatech) found a memory-safety/soundness issue in this crate while scanning Rust code on crates.io for potential vulnerabilities.
Issue Description
csv-sniffer/src/snip.rs
Lines 7 to 18 in d964e42
preamble_skipcount
method creates an uninitialized buffer (buffer
) and passes it to user-providedRead
implementation. This is unsound, because it allows safe Rust code to exhibit an undefined behavior (read from uninitialized memory).This part from the
Read
trait documentation explains the issue:Suggested Fix
It is safe to zero-initialize the newly allocated
u8
buffer before read(), in order to prevent user-providedRead
from accessing old contents of the newly allocated heap memory.Thank you for checking out this issue 👍
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: