Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow for easier file loader integration #337

Closed
ivmartel opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Allow for easier file loader integration #337

ivmartel opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
0.20.0

Comments

@ivmartel
Copy link
Owner

ivmartel commented May 1, 2017

The file/url loading code is not flexible: it is complicated to add support for a new file extension. This must be made more adaptable.
@ivmartel ivmartel added the enhancement New feature or request label May 1, 2017
@ivmartel ivmartel added this to the 0.20.0 milestone May 1, 2017
@rafasoyyo
Copy link
Contributor

The ability to load arraybuffer directly and stop loading will be appreciated, especially in urls.

@ivmartel
Copy link
Owner Author

ivmartel commented May 2, 2017

Ok... What would be your use case?

@ivmartel
Copy link
Owner Author

ivmartel commented May 5, 2017

Have you seen what @tmskmr did in #332? His memory class is what you are asking for?

@rafasoyyo
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, this is usefull te load data from Arraybuffers.
A generic method like app.stopLoading() to be able to cancel load progess can be also usefull.

It is just an idea...

@ivmartel ivmartel mentioned this issue May 8, 2017
Merged
@ivmartel
Copy link
Owner Author

ivmartel commented May 8, 2017

I create a specific issue for stopping the load: see #340.

@ivmartel ivmartel closed this as completed May 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.20.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ivmartel @rafasoyyo