You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 11, 2021. It is now read-only.
@wanderer and @kumavis have shown a lot of interested to have a conversation to JSON as part of the standardised interface.
My only concern is that although we can have a .toJSON, we really can't expect to have a fromJSON, otherwise we would be asking every single format implementor to spend a lifetime figuring out all the quirks of JSON, specially because it does mangle binary and numeric types.
Are we ok with having a .toJSON without a .fromJSON? Is that what people want?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@wanderer and @kumavis have shown a lot of interested to have a conversation to JSON as part of the standardised interface.
My only concern is that although we can have a .toJSON, we really can't expect to have a fromJSON, otherwise we would be asking every single format implementor to spend a lifetime figuring out all the quirks of JSON, specially because it does mangle binary and numeric types.
Are we ok with having a .toJSON without a .fromJSON? Is that what people want?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: