Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plugin Support for Allow / Deny Bitswap replication based on peerID and CID #8867

Open
3 tasks done
whiteowl3 opened this issue Apr 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
3 tasks done
Labels
kind/feature A new feature P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up

Comments

@whiteowl3
Copy link

Checklist

  • My issue is specific & actionable.
  • I am not suggesting a protocol enhancement.
  • I have searched on the issue tracker for my issue.

Description

Recommended for issue here: #8763 (comment)
ipfs/go-bitswap#549 adds allow/deny functionality to bitswap based on peerid and cid.
A plugin should expose this functionality in go-ipfs.

@whiteowl3 whiteowl3 added the kind/feature A new feature label Apr 9, 2022
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Apr 9, 2022

Thank you for submitting your first issue to this repository! A maintainer will be here shortly to triage and review.
In the meantime, please double-check that you have provided all the necessary information to make this process easy! Any information that can help save additional round trips is useful! We currently aim to give initial feedback within two business days. If this does not happen, feel free to leave a comment.
Please keep an eye on how this issue will be labeled, as labels give an overview of priorities, assignments and additional actions requested by the maintainers:

  • "Priority" labels will show how urgent this is for the team.
  • "Status" labels will show if this is ready to be worked on, blocked, or in progress.
  • "Need" labels will indicate if additional input or analysis is required.

Finally, remember to use https://discuss.ipfs.io if you just need general support.

@aschmahmann aschmahmann added the P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up label Jul 29, 2022
@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Aug 10, 2022

Related: #8492 (comment)

@iand
Copy link
Contributor

iand commented Aug 10, 2022

See #7653 and #9010 f plugin route is decided on rather than the rules approach

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature A new feature P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants