Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gateway limitations #1070

Open
whyrusleeping opened this issue Apr 13, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

gateway limitations #1070

whyrusleeping opened this issue Apr 13, 2015 · 6 comments
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/gateway Topic gateway

Comments

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member

We should have some settings so users can configure the gateway to work how they want. What im thinking of is the following:

  • Max file size
    • Users should be able to set limits on how large of files the gateway serves
  • block whitelist
    • specify that the gateway only serve certain blocks
  • block blacklist
    • specify that the gateway should not serve certain blocks
  • max bandwidth
    • specify the maximum bandwidth the gateway should use
@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/gateway Topic gateway labels Apr 13, 2015
@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Apr 13, 2015

👍 to all.

can we use the terms blocklist or denylist and allowlist or safelist ?

@whyrusleeping
Copy link
Member Author

i think changing terminology up on people gets confusing, but i guess we can pick something different.

@btc
Copy link
Contributor

btc commented Apr 14, 2015

+1 for removing blacklist and whitelist from the lexicon

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 22, 2015

allow & deny seem to be common and relatively neutral.

@whyrusleeping whyrusleeping added the help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue label Aug 23, 2016
@koalalorenzo
Copy link
Member

Any update on this feature? :)
At the moment I am solving this with NGINX but it would be nice to have it implemented directly into go-ipfs!

@Stebalien
Copy link
Member

As far as I know, nobody's working on this at the moment (we use nginx as a reverse-proxy as well).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/gateway Topic gateway
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants