Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add independent server implementation #567

Closed
guseggert opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Add independent server implementation #567

guseggert opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
kind/architecture Core architecture of project P3 Low: Not priority right now

Comments

@guseggert
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@guseggert guseggert added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label Jun 28, 2022
@guseggert guseggert self-assigned this Jun 28, 2022
@guseggert guseggert moved this to 🏃‍♀️ In Progress in IPFS Shipyard Team Jun 28, 2022
@guseggert guseggert added status/in-progress In progress kind/architecture Core architecture of project and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Jun 28, 2022
@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Jul 26, 2022

@guseggert : what is the done criteria here?

@BigLep BigLep mentioned this issue Jul 27, 2022
72 tasks
@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Aug 2, 2022

2022-08-02 conversation: we will want to run this against real workloads. We will see what fails and create a list of the followups.
There will be some followup testplans we write.

@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Aug 7, 2022

@guseggert : when this work is compled, what will a consumer of the "independent bitswap server" get? What scope of functionality will it have?

@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Sep 1, 2022

@guseggert : I assume this can be punted given nothing is pulling on this work currently. If you have closing thoughts on done criteria or next steps, lets capture while fresh.

@guseggert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes we'll punt this since we have no use case anymore, that I'm aware of, for a new server implementation. GIven the lack of concrete requirements, I don't have any opinions on done criteria or next steps, if some arise then I'm happy to re-evaluate.

@guseggert guseggert removed their assignment Sep 1, 2022
@guseggert guseggert added P3 Low: Not priority right now and removed status/in-progress In progress labels Sep 1, 2022
@guseggert
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually I'm going to close this as this was really just a subtask for #564 and it doesn't hold any useful context if this issue comes up again in the future.

Repository owner moved this from 🏃‍♀️ In Progress to 🎉 Done in IPFS Shipyard Team Sep 1, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
kind/architecture Core architecture of project P3 Low: Not priority right now
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants