Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BookReader #2

Open
davidar opened this issue Sep 30, 2015 · 9 comments
Open

BookReader #2

davidar opened this issue Sep 30, 2015 · 9 comments

Comments

@davidar
Copy link
Member

davidar commented Sep 30, 2015

See ipfs-inactive/archives#14 for context

This issue is to coordinate how to get the BookReader working well on IPFS (where we can't assume a backend server is available to perform image processing)

CC: @jbenet @RichardLitt

@rht
Copy link

rht commented Sep 30, 2015

As with navigation tool, we use 'table of contents', section-subsection-subsubsection-...-paragraph, page numbers, footnotes, and indexes. Then href, C-f. Then ?

@rht
Copy link

rht commented Sep 30, 2015

@davidar davidar mentioned this issue Oct 1, 2015
@davidar
Copy link
Member Author

davidar commented Oct 1, 2015

@rht

@rht
Copy link

rht commented Oct 12, 2015

To clarify, what are the next in the knowledge navigation tools list going to be like, after the web and search engine?
(also it happens that href and search can be retrofitted to old books)

The repo I linked is more of a reading tool (POS syntax highlighting) than a navigation tool.
I'd be severely crippled if I read code without syntax highlighting (if such thing can be measured).

@rht
Copy link

rht commented Oct 12, 2015

ipfs-shipyard/dataviz#4

@davidar
Copy link
Member Author

davidar commented Oct 13, 2015

@rht These are interesting questions, but I'm not sure they're relevant to this particular issue?

To clarify, what are the next in the knowledge navigation tools list going to be like, after the web and search engine?

Research Lei by @karpathy is/was quite interesting.

The repo I linked is more of a reading tool

Whilst helpful for highly structured languages, I'm not sure that automatic syntax highlighting would help with readability of natural text?

@jbenet
Copy link
Member

jbenet commented Oct 14, 2015

@karpathy i will be at Stanford next wed -- speaking at http://web.stanford.edu/class/ee380/ -- do you have some time to catch up before/after? (I believe we've spoken before, but correct me if i'm wrong).

@rht
Copy link

rht commented Oct 15, 2015

(sorry for bringing up the navigation tool / readability issue here, where should this be, then?)

@karpathy what do you think of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Science (which I believe, is paywalled)?

I'm not sure that automatic syntax highlighting would help with readability of natural text?

For a formalized subset of natural lang, it already does, e.g. the text editor for ACE http://attempto.ifi.uzh.ch/site/.

@davidar
Copy link
Member Author

davidar commented Oct 15, 2015

@rht created #11 to continue this discussion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants