Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 29, 2020. It is now read-only.

Added group ls #42

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 2, 2016
Merged

Added group ls #42

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 2, 2016

Conversation

RichardLitt
Copy link
Contributor

headers does not appear to be an option, as it is a given with the JSON format.

@@ -997,6 +997,143 @@ Outputs the list of peers that were removed.

# Group ls

List links from an object.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What kind of links?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@diasdavid? I'm not sure.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is kind of an alias to ipfs object links (which I believe historically came after), it is one of those that live in the limbo now that we have a files command for anything that is files/unixFS (ipfs object links would print the same links because the links in a UnixFS proto are the ones that are stored in the MerkleDAG proto)

RichardLitt added a commit to ipfs/kubo that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2016
This should make it a bit easier to read. Cf ipfs-inactive/http-api-spec#42 (comment)

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Richard Littauer <[email protected]>
@dignifiedquire
Copy link
Collaborator

Needs rebase

@RichardLitt RichardLitt mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2016
1 task
@daviddias daviddias removed their assignment Feb 19, 2016
@daviddias
Copy link
Contributor

I believe that upon adding more info to the help menu, this is ready for merge.

RichardLitt added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2016
@RichardLitt RichardLitt merged commit 1753b96 into master Mar 2, 2016
@RichardLitt RichardLitt deleted the feature/ls branch March 2, 2016 22:56
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants