-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement R5's native elevation weighting #243
Comments
I've implemented R5's native elevation feature, with two cost functions currently available: Tobler's hiking function and Minetti et al. Now, there is an Below, there is a demonstration of the differences between the cost functions using the Porto Alegre sample dataset:
|
A few more comparisons, for reference. Some trips can be completed within walkingcycling |
This is mostly done now... I've pushed it to the master branch. We still need to:
|
I just added some input checks for the |
This is lookig really good. However, I just noticed that
|
Currently, it's not. They're using regular print commands instead of the Logging engine that we can suppress. I'll open an issue on R5 asking them to change that. |
done |
@mvpsaraiva , does Conveyal mention any publications by Tobler or Minetti that were used as a reference for their algorithm? ps. I just realized the correct spelling is Minetti, not Manetti. this needs to be fixed in r5r |
thanks. I'll add them to the details of setup_r5() |
R5 started considering elevation data as of v6.7. We can remove our elevantion calculations from r5r.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: