Merge pidtree back into ps-tree?

[simonepri]

Following this old issue:
#10

Who are the current maintainers of this package?
For what I saw:
@indexzero is the author (can push on the repo and can publish on npm)
@nelsonic is one of the maintainers (can only push on the repo)
Am I missing someone?

Can we add more contributors to this repo?
#18 (comment)

cc @zixia @soyuka

[soyuka]

We maybe could release a community fork? I've a pending fix on @zixia 's fork also haha

[simonepri]

Let's see what @nelsonic says about that. But this package has 4 Mln downloads per month so if we can keep working on this repo would be better for everyone.

Actually the only one that now can push on npm is @indexzero and he have said that he don't want to maintain this anymore.

@soyuka are you referring to this https://github.com/zixia/ps-tree/pull/1?
Can you create the PR on this repo too?

[soyuka]

Can you create the PR on this repo too?

It's based on @zixia ´s work on the repository so I guess we need to merge his changes first :|

[simonepri]

Oh right!
So let's make a single PR with both changes.

I missed that because @zixia has done all the work in this single PR.
#17

[huan]

@soyuka Let me merge your change in my PR, then I believe my PR at here will include your PR....

:-/

[simonepri]

@zixia can you open another PR removing the addition of appveyor and the changes of the readme?
We have already #29 for that.

[huan]

@simonepri Ok no problem.

I had just modified my PR and remove the README&Appveyor changes.

Please let me know if you think I should modify other parts as well.

[simonepri]

Thank you! I've commentend under the PR.

[simonepri]

@indexzero See also this
#28 (comment)

[soyuka]

FTR merged #17 #24 #27 and #28 to https://github.com/soyuka/ps-tree

[simonepri]

@soyuka Lets wait @nelsonic before proceed please.

I don't see any advantage of working on a community fork if we can push on npm from this one.

[soyuka]

@simonepri I don't want to bother anyone ;) I'm just using this in pidusage-tree, and therefore will use my fork for the time being :). Obviously if things gets handled here I'll use the original version.

https://twitter.com/andrestaltz/status/961600427832872961

TL;DR

• Publish forked packages
• Inform, don't annoy, the original author
• Open source is pointless unless for reading the source
• Less "githubness", more openness
• Small libraries!
• Disagreement is okay, it's great actually
• Minimize consensus surface

[simonepri]

@nelsonic @indexzero news?

[soyuka]

@simonepri pinging them is useless just let them answer if they want to I'm sure they've been notified by now ;). Note that my last contributions to this were almost 1 year ago and there has been no answer yet.

[simonepri]

Actually nelsonic has already merged some of my PRs some days ago:
#26
#25

So I don't think is useless. They are alive. 😁

[huan]

But it seems that @nelsonic only merge Badges...

[simonepri]

Actually I've discovered that the algorithm inside this package is wrong:
https://github.com/indexzero/ps-tree/blob/master/index.js#L79

Following the suggestion of soyuka I've re-created the package using the same codebase developed in:
soyuka/pidusage#49

You can find it here:
https://github.com/simonepri/pidtree

[huan]

@simonepri I saw your pidtree npm, and thanks for adding me to the collaborators.

It seems we have to do a hard fork for this module finally...

[indexzero]

@huan @simonepri if you'd like to discuss merging back into a [email protected] API please let me know. My apologies for not responding sooner. This was on my to-do list, but kept getting pushed back.

[indexzero]

Updating the title of this issue to reflect the current discussion.

[simonepri]

@indexzero pidtree is a from scratch re-work of this package, I'm not 100% sure that having it merged back here is the right choice. @soyuka

[indexzero]

@simonepri exactly! And it has an improved algorithm that is more correct.

This module is downloaded about 5,000,000 times a month. Wouldn't it be great if all those folks got a better quality module?

By releasing it as 2.0.0 it gives folks an upgrade path that is opt-in as well.

If you are interested I would add you as an owner and a maintainer on npm. Let me know! ^_^

[huan]

@indexzero it's great to see you wake up and come back to us! :D

[simonepri]

@indexzero Your point is right.
I'm still not 100% happy with the implementation of pidtree and I would like to do some rework before starting to think about merging it back here.

My idea is to create separate packages for each platform and then to have pidtree or ps-tree to be just a wrapper for the right implementation.
Also, I wold like to add a more sophisticated cross-platform testing though docker.

The ETA of this would be at least a month, since I'm super busy right now.

[indexzero]

@simonepri that makes sense. Given your past excellent work on PR #24, #27, and #29 I've added you as a collaborator to this project. When you accept that invite I am happy to make you a full Administrator.

Once you've reached a place you're happy with from an implementation perspective please let me know and I will add you as an owner on npm.

[indexzero]

So it turns out that for personal repositories they only the person they are associated with can be administrators. I am going to move this over to the foreverjs org since it's heavily depended on by that package –– unless there are other thoughts of course.