Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support JPEG XL #1765

Open
sorairolake opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Support JPEG XL #1765

sorairolake opened this issue Jul 27, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
topic: formats Towards better encoding format coverage

Comments

@sorairolake
Copy link
Contributor

sorairolake commented Jul 27, 2022

This format is preliminary supported by many major web browsers such as Firefox and Chromium (https://caniuse.com/jpegxl). Also, some graphics softwares already supports it, so I think it would be useful to support it.

@HeroicKatora HeroicKatora added the topic: formats Towards better encoding format coverage label Jul 27, 2022
@lifthrasiir
Copy link
Contributor

J40, the JPEG XL decoder implementation currently written in C, is considering a parallel Rust version that may (hopefully, positively) affect this issue. For more information please refer to lifthrasiir/j40#10.

@Quackdoc
Copy link

https://github.com/tirr-c/jxl-oxide dual licenced with MIT and BSD

@fintelia
Copy link
Contributor

Interesting. Do you know if that crate has been published to crates.io yet or whether there's plans to do so?

@Quackdoc
Copy link

crates are slowly being published, it should be best to wait for the jxl-render crate, currently it has not yet been published author's page is here

@EugeneVert
Copy link

jxl-oxide 0.1.0 has been published to crates.io
https://crates.io/crates/jxl-oxide

@mirh
Copy link

mirh commented Sep 9, 2024

Speaking of rust and jxl, you might be interested to tirr-c/jxl-oxide#335

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: formats Towards better encoding format coverage
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants