From ac0b5dd1d8e16cb4bb7999fef8842babb95fd3c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yogesh Deshpande Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:35:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Dionna Amalie Glaze --- draft-ietf-rats-corim.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/draft-ietf-rats-corim.md b/draft-ietf-rats-corim.md index 7f2806f1..f4ed0149 100644 --- a/draft-ietf-rats-corim.md +++ b/draft-ietf-rats-corim.md @@ -2083,8 +2083,8 @@ This can be acheived by sorting the triples before processing, by repeating proc #### ACS Augmentation Requirements {#sec-acs-aug-req} The ordering of ECTs in the ACS is not significant. -Logically, new ECT entries are appended to the existing ACS. -But implementations may optimize ECT order to achieve better performance. +Logically, the ACS represents the conjunction of all claims, so adding an ECT entry to the existing ACS at the end is equivalent to inserting it anywhere else. +Implementations may optimize ECT order to achieve better performance. Additions to the ACS MUST be atomic. ### Evidence Augmentation (Phase 2) {#sec-phase2}