did peer 4 resolution #2692
Merged
did peer 4 resolution #2692
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jason Syrotuck <[email protected]>
Jsyro
force-pushed
the
feature/did-peer-4-resolution
branch
from
c2551ca to
0e279a2
Compare
|
|
Looks good to me, but I defer to @dbluhm on this one. We’ll want an “emit” capability — that will be a follow up PR? |
Yes, I planned to add 'emit' functionality in future work when prioritized, but this a change that adds functionality and can be tested ! |
dbluhm
approved these changes
Jan 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-peer-4.
based on the behaviour expected by the specification.
https://identity.foundation/peer-did-method-spec/#method-4-short-form-and-long-form