Multi-tenant self-managed mediation verkey lookup #2232
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Jason Sherman <[email protected]>
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
|
@TimoGlastra @dbluhm @ianco — could one of you review/approve this PR? Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #2231
There are two ways to setup mediation for multitenancy. One is to have the base wallet mediate for all tenants, and the second is for each tenant to manage their own. In the second case, there was a bug when locating the verkey and packing the outbound message.
This PR checks if the base wallet is mediating and decides which responder to use. If the tenant is managing their own mediation then we need the sub-wallet profile to create the responder NOT the base wallet profile.