We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hiya I found when testing out Missionary that ordering appears to matter when evaluating tasks:
(def task (m/sp 1 2 3)) (tests (m/? task) := 3 nil := (m/? task))
Both these assertions pass ^
It seems like one of them should fail because in normal equality if a = b is true and b = a is also true
I don't believe Missionary should be side-effecting in this case
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Context: https://clojurians.slack.com/archives/C7Q9GSHFV/p1649630764612899
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks, we had not seen this yet
No branches or pull requests
Hiya I found when testing out Missionary that ordering appears to matter when evaluating tasks:
Both these assertions pass ^
It seems like one of them should fail because in normal equality if a = b is true and b = a is also true
I don't believe Missionary should be side-effecting in this case
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: