Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results #4

Open
usmaann opened this issue Nov 14, 2018 · 3 comments
Open

Results #4

usmaann opened this issue Nov 14, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@usmaann
Copy link

usmaann commented Nov 14, 2018

Hi, I tried to run the code you provided and compared the results mentioned on your paper.
Results i got are not the same which are mentioned in the paper?

anything wrong I am doing?
below is a snapshot of the result generated where as in your paper you claimed AUC of 65.9+/- 1.2

image

@hwwang55
Copy link
Owner

The released dataset is only a small proportion of the original dataset. The model is not trained well on the current training data. This is for a demo.

@Five-second-curry-stick

I seem to get strange results
epoch 0 train_auc: 0.5305 train_acc: 0.6062 test_auc: 0.5005 test_acc: 0.5866
epoch 1 train_auc: 0.5377 train_acc: 0.6062 test_auc: 0.5556 test_acc: 0.5866
epoch 2 train_auc: 0.5367 train_acc: 0.6062 test_auc: 0.5626 test_acc: 0.5866

@chenghuasong0826
Copy link

我似乎得到奇怪的结果
epoch 0 train_auc:0.5305 train_acc:0.6062 test_auc:0.5005 test_acc:0.5866
epoch 1 train_auc:0.5377 train_acc:0.6062 test_auc:0.5556 test_acc:0.5866
epoch 2 train_auc:0.5367 train_acc:0.6062 test_auc:0.5626 test_acc:0.5866

你好,我也是跟你一样的结果,你后来有什么改进没有,能发便交流下吗?如果看到可以加我的qq513932245

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants