Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Looking for inversions in Minigraph/CACTUS and PGGB decomposed vcfs #14

Open
ratrrs opened this issue May 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Comments

@ratrrs
Copy link

ratrrs commented May 5, 2023

Hi,

I am looking for inversions in hprc-v1.0-mc.grch38.vcfbub.a100k.wave.vcf.gz and hprc-v1.0-pggb.grch38.vcfbub.a100k.wave.vcf.gz but am only finding the following annotations TYPE for structural variants: ins, del, complex. In addition, all INV annotations for variants in those files are followed by '0', so it's not clear where inversions are when using INV. Are there other annotations in INFO I should be looking for for inversions or a separate list all together for these samples? Thank you.

@ekg
Copy link

ekg commented May 9, 2023

Hi,

I believe there is a field that should be in the vcfwave decomposed VCFs, INV=1, where the decomposition detects an inversion. Note that this will happen only for a limited size range of inversions, from 1kbp to 100kbp if I remember correctly.

If this doesn't work we can approach the problem using the input not WFA-realigned VCFs.

@ratrrs
Copy link
Author

ratrrs commented May 9, 2023

Hi,
After parsing hprc-v1.0-mc.grch38.vcfbub.a100k.wave.vcf.gz and hprc-v1.0-pggb.grch38.vcfbub.a100k.wave.vcf.gz, I am only discovering "INV=0". There are ~5 million records with INV in the INFO column for those two files, but none are annotated with "INV=1".

@ekg
Copy link

ekg commented May 9, 2023

I think you're seeing that this is something we need to work on. It should be correctly annotated, but it is possible that the version used had a bug at many points in the process that would infer the presence of an inversion.

It is also possible that the graph construction in both methods is resulting in problems putting inversions in the graph. Consider it a work in progress.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants