Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump pybotvac to 0.0.10 #16799

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2018
Merged

Bump pybotvac to 0.0.10 #16799

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2018

Conversation

dshokouhi
Copy link
Member

Description:

The latest version of pybotvac resolves an issue where we were iterating over the cached list of robots instead of the refreshed list. Non connected botvacs are also ignored now as they cannot be controlled.

Related issue (if applicable): N/A

Pull request in home-assistant.io with documentation (if applicable):

N/A

Example entry for configuration.yaml (if applicable):

neato:
  username: username
  password: password

Checklist:

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass with tox. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt by running script/gen_requirements_all.py.

@ghost ghost added the in progress label Sep 22, 2018
Copy link
Member

@fabaff fabaff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🐦

@fabaff fabaff merged commit 94d38a1 into home-assistant:dev Sep 23, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Sep 23, 2018
@dshokouhi dshokouhi deleted the bump_pybotvac branch September 23, 2018 07:43
@balloob balloob mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2018
@home-assistant home-assistant locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 5, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants