You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is something that slipped past me previously, but it seems that loadWell (previously loadOmeWell) loads a grid of images at the highest resolution. This design choice leads to a lot of data-transfer and slow loading times. Is this the desired behavior?
Ideally the grid could handle multiple multiscale images, but in the mean time should we have some heuristic for which level to choose?
Yes, it was the intended behaviour since in the examples I've worked with so far, the number of Images in a Well has been relatively small and the images not very big, so the full resolution is more useful than a thumbnail. It was also slightly simpler to load the highest resolution since it doesn't require you to load the resolutions info for a sample image (as we do for the Plate).
But yes, this could certainly be improved to pick a suitable resolution based on the size and number of the Well images.
This is something that slipped past me previously, but it seems that
loadWell
(previouslyloadOmeWell
) loads a grid of images at the highest resolution. This design choice leads to a lot of data-transfer and slow loading times. Is this the desired behavior?Ideally the grid could handle multiple multiscale images, but in the mean time should we have some heuristic for which level to choose?
cc: @will-moore
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: