Flatten Junctions with the same nature #4748
Replies: 1 comment
-
Since nobody objected, I'll consider this as agreement with the approach I described. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I just realized that we currently produce a
SqmAndPredicate
/SqmOrPredicate
/Junction
for everyand
/or
operator which leads to deep AST trees.We already manage a list of predicates in
Junction
, but it only ever receives 2 elements. What do you think about flattening the junctions instead to avoid these deep AST trees?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions