-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document move_visual_line_* commands #6691
Comments
I wanna a design discussion area where recorded all possible designs of helix:
|
Newbie here and not 100% sure about this given the refactor, but there might already be some of what you're looking for here: I agree that the descriptions don't seem super clear though - would be happy to take this on as a first issue and try to find a phrasing that would be easier to understand. |
Oh, I understand now. You're right - |
only typed commands are aumatucally documented, keybindings are documented by hand |
Hm, OK, I think I've played with that enough to understand it. It seems like there's currently no page on the site where unbound static commands are documented, but they do all have docstrings defined in the code. Would an extension to the |
that seems reasonable but would be a slightly larger change and I think we want to also keep the manual keymap documentation aswell. The automatic documentation should be just a separate table of all commands IMO. So for this specific issue, I would still like to see the documentation adjusted manually (as the commands are bound in the default keymap). Adding the automatically generated table could be a separate PR |
Makes sense to me! I can work on the docgen extension PR. I'm happy to do manual documentation as well, but one reason I suggested the docgen extension is that there doesn't seem to be a designated place to document unbound commands at the moment. The two most obvious options seem to be:
Happy to do either one! |
A new file seems better to me otherwise we endup with too many merge conflicts between auto generated text and handwritten documentation |
I've started the manual documentation on a fork here. It also appears that the templating software used to generate the website has a |
Yeah inclydijg annexternal file instead of editing an existing file is all I meant with seperate file. I dont habe strong opinion whether it should be its own page but it seems a bit more structured. You can go with what you prefer and details can be discussed during PR review. |
BTW. |
This was also being worked on here I think #3840 |
Oh thanks @pascalkuthe , I should have checked the actual software. Looks like perhaps that documentation also needs to be updated - the website says j/k are bound to move_line_down/up. I think the PR gabydd mentioned is a little further along, though, so perhaps this is unnecessary after all. |
I was thinking about the title of 3690 when I was searching at first through the PR's and couldn't find it either, I was able to find the correct issue though and the pr though that. |
I think this issue can be closed, since it's addressed in the PR @gabydd found? |
Ah, I understand. I've created the PR here: #6918 |
Hi.
As part of the soft-wrap PR, the commands
move_visual_line_down
andmove_visual_line_up
were not documented.It would be nice to add them to the documentation.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: