-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release new stable version #36
Comments
I see lots of C-code in the |
jruby-pg is derived from ruby-pg and the intention is/was to add a jruby port to the pg gem and to merge it to ruby-pg eventually, so that we can release a java version of the pg.gem. This is why there are C files in the project and why Hoe is used. However ruby-pg has added a lot of functions in the meantime, which are used by the PostgreSQL adapter of rails-5. Therefore jruby-pg isn't compatible with rails-5, so far. It would be great if someone with enough java knowledge could get jruby-pg more in sync with ruby-pg. Removing Hoe is less helpful, to reach this aim, because it diverges the projects instead of join them. |
Hi @larskanis ! Thanks for the feedback! It all makes more sense now. So maybe this work should be done on a branch at ged/ruby-pg ? |
Time to make this happen. |
I have pushed jruby-pg 0.1 to rubygems.org. It appears to load and run samples ok. |
Hi @headius !
I'd like to do a refresh of this gem as an alternative to ARJDBC.
Specifically, I would like to refresh the gem build system to a straight
gem build
without Hoe, and release a new stable version.What name should the gem have? it is called
pg
,jruby-pg
, andpg_jruby
in theRakefile
, the GitHub project, and in RubyGems.org. I guesspg_jruby
is the right name since it has already been released with that name.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: