Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pre-RFC: IDE integration for Haskell testing frameworks #45

Closed
santiweight opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Pre-RFC: IDE integration for Haskell testing frameworks #45

santiweight opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@santiweight
Copy link

santiweight commented Nov 22, 2022

NOTE This is a pre-RFC, intended to get a first impression perspective on the validity of my solution to a problem in the Haskell ecosystem. If the response is something like "this seems like a good direction", then I'll go ahead and clean the PR up and put it out on discourse etc. In other words: feel free to simply glance :)

I'm currently working on a proposal for integrating various testing frameworks' output format so that they can be used in IDEs that support Haskell.

Feedback is very helpful, especially from testing framework maintainers, so that I can better understand what use cases are most important and we don't miss anything important.

Rendered

@david-christiansen
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for submitting a proposal!

Before this issue gathers discussion and comments, would you mind restructuring this as a pull request? That'll help us follow our usual workflow. Instructions are here: https://github.com/haskellfoundation/tech-proposals/blob/main/proposals/PROPOSALS.md#proposal

@santiweight
Copy link
Author

Oh - I was avoiding doing so until it was more ready. I was hoping to get a pair of eyes to check it was not awful before putting the effort into cleaning it up to a better standard.

I realize I didn't make that clear in the issue 😅

@david-christiansen
Copy link
Contributor

I think that it is already not awful, and perfectly fine to have as a PR as it currently stands. It's an expected part of the process to revise the text in the PR in response to the discussion. What I'd like to avoid is having discussion split between Discourse, an issue, and the PR - it's much easier to follow if the PR has the whole history.

That OK with you?

@santiweight santiweight changed the title IDE integration for Haskell testing frameworks Pre-RFC: IDE integration for Haskell testing frameworks Nov 22, 2022
@santiweight
Copy link
Author

Yep: I'll put it up for RFC

@david-christiansen
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@santiweight
Copy link
Author

#46

Closing :) Thanks for the guidance David!

@david-christiansen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants