-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 698
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document extra-packages a bit better and clean up related entries (closes #5448) #8535
Conversation
should be considered local packages.` (Not implemented) | ||
Specifies a list of external packages from Hackage, which | ||
should be considered local packages. The motivation for | ||
:cfg-field:`extra-packages` is making libraries that are not |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this one possible motivation or the motivation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Taken straight from the horse's mouth:
#3737 (comment)
I imagine there are other uses, but I don't know.
"A common use case" would be an alternative.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good job!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks for improving docs
@linearray: thanks a lot for the docs improvement. BTW, we normally use the https://github.com/haskell/cabal/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#github-pull-request-conventions Please give it a try next time, it's pretty handy. :) |
Please review carefully, I have never used any of these and only documented them in the way it makes sense to me, which is not necessarily the correct one.
closes #5448
Please include the following checklist in your PR:
Please also shortly describe how you tested your change. Bonus points for added tests!