You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@catsby Is there any chance of making terraform so that these CAN co-exist.
Its useful to be able to have one ebs volume with delete_on_termination, and one without.
Either that or the aws_volume_attachment resource needs a delete_on_termination too, so if the instance is removed, it propagates to removing the volume too.
Hey @catsby, closing this since we're not working on it atm and I actually do believe there are enhancement requests for a global validation function. We'll leave it at that for now.
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Users should not be able to both specify any
ebs_block_devices
in an instance, as well as have that instance included in avolume_attachment
resource.Doing so causes a plan/refresh loop, due to the conflicting count of EBS Block devices.
See #3262 as an example
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: