You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey all - new to Terraform, really liking it so far! Thanks for building a such a great tool.
I saw that there is a Bitbucket provider to manage webhooks, but the repositories must specified. I'm still learning TF, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but if we add a BB data source of all the repositories, I'd be able to loop through those repositories and set webhooks / default reviewers, right?
If so, I can take a stab at implementing this data source.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @saitheexplorer, thanks for the issue! It looks like the resources in the bitbucket provider only require the repository name, and not the fully evaluated repository information. It might be worth trying to use a pre-created repositories name.
However, adding a data source for a bitbucket repository would be helpful in a lot of other cases and would be a great addition if you still wished to tackle this one. Thanks!
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Apr 9, 2020
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hey all - new to Terraform, really liking it so far! Thanks for building a such a great tool.
I saw that there is a Bitbucket provider to manage webhooks, but the repositories must specified. I'm still learning TF, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but if we add a BB data source of all the repositories, I'd be able to loop through those repositories and set webhooks / default reviewers, right?
If so, I can take a stab at implementing this data source.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: