Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

alicloud: simplify validators #12982

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2017
Merged

alicloud: simplify validators #12982

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2017

Conversation

josephholsten
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

return
}
return
return validation.IntBetween(1, 65535)(v, k)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason the validation functions are wrapped rather than being used directly in the schema? Seems to create a lot of redundant functions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mostly because there are a ton of tests, and I wanted to be certain that all of these worked correctly before inlining.

speaking of which, any thoughts on how to test the validation functions after I inline them? seems overkill to actually create full HCL test data for each variant.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense.

Where the validation functions are used in the azurerm provider there are no tests, we trust that the validation package itself is tested properly.

Copy link
Contributor

@stack72 stack72 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the work here @josephholsten and thanks for the review @pmcatominey

@stack72 stack72 merged commit 855adb4 into master Mar 23, 2017
@stack72 stack72 deleted the cleanup-validation branch March 23, 2017 08:57
mbfrahry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2017
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 15, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 15, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants