Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_notification_hub_authorization_rule - add primary_connection_string and secondary_connection_string computed attributes #26188

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

AlexPykavy
Copy link
Contributor

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_resource - support for the thing1 property [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @AlexPykavy - Thanks for this PR. Could you take a look at the question below?

thanks

Comment on lines 95 to 108
"primary_connection_string": {
Type: pluginsdk.TypeString,
Computed: true,
},

"secondary_connection_string": {
Type: pluginsdk.TypeString,
Computed: true,
},
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should these properties not be marked as Sensitive: true? I think the above access keys should also be so, but that would possibly be a breaking change at this point, but could be prepared for 4.0 using Sensitive: !features.FourPointOhBeta()?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point! Sure, I'll correct them.

…on_string` and `secondary_connection_string` computed attributes
Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @AlexPykavy - Thanks for the quick turnaround on those changes, LGTM now 👍

@jackofallops jackofallops merged commit edd2d1e into hashicorp:main Jun 3, 2024
33 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.107.0 milestone Jun 3, 2024
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
dduportal added a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.104.2&#34; to &#34;3.107.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.107.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.107.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
**New Resource:**
`azurerm_data_protection_backup_policy_postgresql_flexible_server`
([#26024](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26024))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20240604.1114748` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26216](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26216
`advisor`: update API version to `2023-01-01`
([#26205](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26205
`keyvault`: handling the Resources API returning Key Vaults that have
been deleted when populating the cache
([#26199](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26199
`machinelearning`: update API version to `2024-04-01`
([#26168](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26168
`network/privatelinkservices` - update to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26212](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26212
`network/serviceendpointpolicies` - update to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26196](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26196
`network/virtualnetworks` - update to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26217](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26217
`network/virtualwans`: update route resources to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#26189](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26189
`azurerm_container_app_job` - support for the `key_vault_secret_id` and
`identity` properties in the `secret` block
([#25969](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25969
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - support forthe `dns_zone_ids` popperty in
the `web_app_routing` block
([#26117](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26117
`azurerm_notification_hub_authorization_rule` - support for the
`primary_connection_string` and `secondary_connection_string` properties
([#26188](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26188
`azurerm_subnet` - support for the `default_outbound_access_enabled`
property
([#25259](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25259))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_api_management_named_value` - will now
enforce setting the `secret` property when setting the
`value_from_key_vault` property
([#26150](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26150
`azurerm_storage_sync_server_endpoint` - improve pooling to work around
api inconsistencies
([#26204](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26204
`azurerm_virtual_network` - split create and update function to fix
lifecycle - ignore
([#26246](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26246
`azurerm_vpn_server_configuration` - split create and update function to
fix lifecycle - ignore
([#26175](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26175
`azurerm_vpn_server_configuration_policy_group` - split create and
update function to fix lifecycle - ignore
([#26207](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26207
`azurerm_vpn_site` - split create and update function to fix lifecycle -
ignore changes
([#26163](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26163))&#xA;&#xA;DEPRECATIONS:&#xA;&#xA;*
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - the property `dns_zone_id` has been
superseded by the property `dns_zone_ids` in the `web_app_routing` block
([#26117](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26117
`azurerm_nginx_deployment` - the block `configuration` has been
deprecated and superseded by the resource `azurerm_nginx_configuration`
([#25773](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25773))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/229/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

---------

Signed-off-by: Damien Duportal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2024

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 4, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants