Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Resource: azurerm_workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance #24342

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor

Per #22869 (comment), I split the SAP Virtual Instance per the configuration type. See more details from #22869 (comment).

--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/requiresImport (939.89s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/complete (699.58s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/update (731.28s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/basic (699.47s)

Note: Before using this resource, it's required to submit the request of registering the Resource Provider with Azure CLI az provider register --namespace "Microsoft.Workloads". The Resource Provider can take a while to register, you can check the status by running az provider show --namespace "Microsoft.Workloads" --query "registrationState". Once this outputs "Registered" the Resource Provider is available for use. I also added this note in the resource doc.

References:
Azure doc
REST API specs

Copy link
Contributor

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @neil-yechenwei
Thanks for this PR - I've taken a look through and left some comments inline. If we can fix those up, this should be good to go 👍

Thanks!

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ms-zhenhua , thanks for the comments. I updated PR. Please take another look. Thanks.

@ms-zhenhua
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-yechenwei thank you for your updates. LGTM~

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2024 10:37
@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

hey @neil-yechenwei

We’ve made some structural changes to hashicorp/go-azure-sdk which have split the SDK into multiple Go Modules. This means that the SDK which previously existed at github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk now exists at:

  • github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/resource-manager - for the Resource Manager SDK.
  • github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/sdk - for the base layer.

We’ve updated the Provider to use the new Go Module structure in PR #24636 - as such would you mind rebasing this Pull Request on top of main to remove the merge conflict?

Thanks!

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

I updated PR for the SDK change.

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @neil-yechenwei - I have left one minor comment and query on this, but otherwise this is looking good!

Also, can you confirm the tests are still passing after the previous changes? Thanks!

Comment on lines 65 to 66

* `type` - (Required) The type of Managed Service Identity that should be configured on this SAP Discovery Virtual Instance. Only possible value is `UserAssigned`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* `type` - (Required) The type of Managed Service Identity that should be configured on this SAP Discovery Virtual Instance. Only possible value is `UserAssigned`.
* `type` - (Required) The type of Managed Service Identity that should be configured on this SAP Discovery Virtual Instance. The only possible value is `UserAssigned`.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

There is a regression issue on the service side and service team intends to fix it this month. So I will paste test result here once this issue is fixed.

@catriona-m catriona-m added waiting-response upstream/microsoft Indicates that there's an upstream issue blocking this issue/PR labels Mar 19, 2024
@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

neil-yechenwei commented Mar 27, 2024

@catriona-m , I just now reran the related test cases and they all passed. Below is the latest test result. Thanks.

--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/basic (895.12s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/requiresImport (878.68s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/complete (934.58s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/update (897.12s)

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@catriona-m , Is this PR good to be merged?

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @neil-yechenwei - I spotted a couple of rg test names that could be updated, but once those are fixed this should be good to go 👍. Thanks!

location = azurerm_resource_group.test.location
environment = "NonProd"
sap_product = "S4HANA"
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d"
managed_resource_group_name = "acctestmanagedRG%d"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

location = azurerm_resource_group.test.location
environment = "NonProd"
sap_product = "S4HANA"
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
managed_resource_group_name = "managedTestRG%d"
managed_resource_group_name = "acctestmanagedRG%d"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@catriona-m , thanks for the comment. I updated PR and reran the related test cases. Below is the test result.

--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/update (1388.07s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/basic (1012.23s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/requiresImport (1146.39s)
--- PASS: TestAccWorkloadsSAPDiscoveryVirtualInstanceSequential/sapVirtualInstance/complete (1170.18s)

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @neil-yechenwei LGTM!

@catriona-m catriona-m merged commit 4505ac1 into hashicorp:main Apr 3, 2024
33 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.98.0 milestone Apr 3, 2024
catriona-m added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2024
dduportal pushed a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.97.1&#34; to &#34;3.98.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.98.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.98.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
New Resource: `azurerm_static_web_app_function_app_registration`
([#25331](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25331
New Resource:
`azurerm_system_center_virtual_machine_manager_inventory_items`
([#25110](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25110
New Resource: `azurerm_workloads_sap_discovery_virtual_instance`
([#24342](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24342
New Resource: `azurerm_redis_cache_policy`
([#25477](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25477
New Resource: `azurerm_redis_cache_policy_assignment`
([#25477](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25477))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20240402.1085733` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#25482](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25482
dependencies: updating to `v0.67.0` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-helpers`
([#25446](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25446
dependencies: updating to `v0.25.4` of
`github.com/tombuildsstuff/giovanni`
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`alertsmanagement` - updating remaining resources to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#25486](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25486
`applicationinsights` - updating remaining resources to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#25376](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25376
`compute` - update to API version `2024-03-01`
([#25436](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25436
`compute` - update shared image resources and data sources to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#25503](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25503
`containerinstance` - update to use the transport layer from
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/go-autorest`
([#25416](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25416
`maintenance` - updating to API Version `2023-04-01`
([#25388](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25388
`recovery_services` - Add `recovery_service` block to the provider that
supports `vm_backup_stop_protection_and_retain_data_on_destroy` and
`purge_protected_items_from_vault_on_destroy`([#25515](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25515
`storage` - the Storage Account cache is now populated using
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#25437](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25437
`azurerm_bot_service_azure_bot` - support for the
`cmk_key_vault_key_url` property
([#23640](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23640
`azurerm_capacity_reservation` - update validation for `capacity`
([#25471](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25471
`azurerm_container_app` - add support for `key_vault_id` and `identity`
properties in the `secret` block
([#24773](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24773
`azurerm_databricks_workspace` - expose
`managed_services_cmk_key_vault_id` and `managed_disk_cmk_key_vault_id
and key_vault_id` to support cross subscription CMK&#39;s.
([#25091](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25091
`azurerm_databricks_workspace_root_dbfs_customer_managed_key` - expose
`key_vault_id` to support cross subscription CMK&#39;s.
([#25091](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25091
`azurerm_managed_hsm_role_*_ids` - use specific resource id to replace
generic nested item id
([#25323](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25323
`azurerm_mssql_database` - add support for `secondary_type`
([#25360](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25360
`azurerm_monitor_scheduled_query_rules_alert_v2` - support for the
`identity` block
([#25365](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25365
`azurerm_mssql_server_extended_auditing_policy` - support for
`audit_actions_and_groups` and `predicate_expression`
([#25425](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25425
`azurerm_netapp_account` - can now be imported
([#25384](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25384
`azurerm_netapp_volume` - support for the `kerberos_enabled`,
`smb_continuous_availability_enabled`, `kerberos_5_read_only_enabled`,
`kerberos_5_read_write_enabled`, `kerberos_5i_read_only_enabled`,
`kerberos_5i_read_write_enabled`, `kerberos_5p_read_only_enabled`, and
`kerberos_5p_read_write_enabled` properties
([#25385](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25385
`azurerm_recovery_services_vault` - upgrading to version `2024-01-01`
([#25325](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25325
`azurerm_stack_hci_cluster` - the `client_id` property is now optional
([#25407](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25407
`azurerm_storage_encryption_scope` - refactoring to use
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/azure-sdk-for-go`
([#25437](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25437
`azurerm_mssql_elasticpool` - the `maintenance_configuration_name`
property now supports values `SQL_SouthAfricaNorth_DB_1`,
`SQL_SouthAfricaNorth_DB_2`, `SQL_WestUS3_DB_1` and `SQL_WestUS3_DB_2`
([#25500](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25500
`azurerm_lighthouse_assignment` - updating API Version from `2019-06-01`
to `2022-10-01`
([#25473](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25473))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `network` - updating the `GatewaySubnet` validation to
show the Subnet Name when the validation fails
([#25484](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25484
`azurerm_function_app_hybrid_connection` - fix an issue during creation
when `send_key_name` is specified
([#25379](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25379
`azurerm_linux_web_app_slot` - fix a crash when upgrading the provider
to v3.88.0 or later
([#25406](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25406
`azurerm_mssql_database` - update the behavior of the `enclave_type`
field.
([#25508](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25508
`azurerm_mssql_elasticpool` - update the behavior of the `enclave_type`
field.
([#25508](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25508
`azurerm_network_manager_deployment` - add locking
([#25368](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25368
`azurerm_resource_group_template_deployment` - changes to
`parameters_content` and `template_content` now force `output_content`
to be updated in the plan
([#25403](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25403
`azurerm_storage_blob` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is
unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_container` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is
unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem` - fix a potential crash when
the endpoint is unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem_path` - fix a potential crash
when the endpoint is unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_queue` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is
unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_share` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint is
unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_share_directory` - fix a potential crash when the
endpoint is unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_share_directory` - resolve an issue where directories
might fail to destroy
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_share_file` - fix a potential crash when the endpoint
is unreachable
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_storage_share_file` - fix several bugs with path handling when
creating files in subdirectories
([#25404](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25404
`azurerm_web_app_hybrid_connection` - fix an issue during creation when
`send_key_name` is specified
([#25379](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25379
`azurerm_windows_web_app` - prevent a panic during resource upgrade
([#25509](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25509))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/88/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 4, 2024

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 4, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
dependencies documentation service/workloads size/XL upstream/microsoft Indicates that there's an upstream issue blocking this issue/PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants