`azurerm_mssql_server` and `azurerm_mssql_database` - upgrade from `v5.0/sql` to `2023-02-01-preview` #23721

WodansSon · 2023-10-28T03:24:19Z

Packages which are upgraded in this PR:

2023-02-01-preview/backupshorttermretentionpolicies
2023-02-01-preview/databases
2023-02-01-preview/geobackuppolicies
2023-02-01-preview/LogicalDatabaseTransparentDataEncryption
2023-02-01-preview/longtermretentionpolicies
~~2023-02-01-preview/replicatonlinks~~
2023-02-01-preview/restorabledroppeddatabases
2023-02-01-preview/serverazureadadministrators
2023-02-01-preview/serverazureadonlyauthentications
2023-02-01-preview/serverconnectionpolicies
2023-02-01-preview/servers
2023-02-01-preview/serversecurityalertpolicies

WodansSon · 2023-11-13T04:26:14Z

All test that can pass, do pass... the last four failures are due to a regression in the RP and the service team is currently working on a fix for that, current ETA end of November...

tombuildsstuff

hey @WodansSon

Thanks for pushing those changes - I've taken a look through and left some comments inline, but if we can fix those up then this otherwise LGTM 👍

Thans!

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_data_source.go

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T09:19:00Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_resource.go

+			// NOTE: This call does not return a future it returns a response, but you will get a future back if the status code is 202...
+			// https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/sql/server-azure-ad-only-authentications/delete?view=rest-sql-2023-05-01-preview&tabs=HTTP
+			if response.WasStatusCode(resp.HttpResponse, 202) {
+				// It was accepted but not completed, it is now an async operation...
+				log.Printf("[INFO] Delete Azure Active Directory Only Administrators response was a 202 WaitForStateContext...")
+
+				// NOTE: the resp.Poller.PollUntilDone(ctx) gets stuck in a loop and never returns even when the status code
+				// being retuned by the service is a 200... could not figure out how to get the resourcemanager.PollerFromResponse()
+				// to work, opted for a waitforstate instead...
+				deadline, ok := ctx.Deadline()
+				if !ok {
+					return fmt.Errorf("internal-error: context had no deadline")
+				}
+
+				// NOTE: Internal x-ref, this is another case of hashicorp/go-azure-sdk#307 so this can be removed once that's fixed
+				stateConf := &pluginsdk.StateChangeConf{
+					Pending: []string{"InProgress"},
+					Target:  []string{"Succeeded"},
+					Refresh: func() (interface{}, string, error) {
+						resp, err := aadOnlyAuthenticationsClient.Get(ctx, pointer.From(id))
+						if err != nil {
+							return nil, "Failed", fmt.Errorf("polling for the delete status of the Azure Active Directory Only Administrator: %+v", err)
+						}
+
+						if model := resp.Model; model != nil {
+							if model.Name != nil {
+								if props := model.Properties; props != nil {
+									if !props.AzureADOnlyAuthentication && strings.EqualFold(pointer.From(model.Name), "Default") {
+										return resp, "Succeeded", nil
+									}
+								}
+							}
+						}
+
+						return resp, "InProgress", nil
+					},
+					ContinuousTargetOccurence: 2,
+					MinTimeout:                5 * time.Second,
+					Timeout:                   time.Until(deadline),
+				}
+
+				if _, err = stateConf.WaitForStateContext(ctx); err != nil {
+					return fmt.Errorf("waiting for the deletion of the Azure Active Directory Only Administrator: %+v", err)
+				}
+			}
+		}


(as discussed offline) we should be able to use a Custom Poller for this instead - example: https://gist.github.com/tombuildsstuff/70a174c4dc8a3e6111e659a9d28df0ea

Fixed. Took me a bit to figure out I needed to implement the custom poller itself, but I got there... lol... 🙂

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T14:03:57Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_resource.go

+		if d.HasChange("key_vault_key_id") {
+			keyVaultKeyId := d.Get(("transparent_data_encryption_key_vault_key_id")).(string)


This is a bug, can we fix this:

Suggested change

if d.HasChange("key_vault_key_id") {

keyVaultKeyId := d.Get(("transparent_data_encryption_key_vault_key_id")).(string)

if d.HasChange("transparent_data_encryption_key_vault_key_id") {

keyVaultKeyId := d.Get("transparent_data_encryption_key_vault_key_id").(string)

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T14:11:48Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_resource_test.go

+	if resp.Model == nil {
+		return nil, fmt.Errorf("server model was nil")
+	}
+
+	return utils.Bool(resp.Model.Id != nil), nil


Looks like this one's still pending?

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T14:13:43Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_resource_test.go

@@ -225,7 +228,7 @@ func TestAccMsSqlServer_azureadAdminWithAADAuthOnly(t *testing.T) {
 	})
 }

-func TestAccMsSqlServer_updateAzureadAuthenticationOnlyWithIdentity(t *testing.T) {
+func TestAccMsSqlServer_azureadAuthenticationOnlyWithIdentityUpdate(t *testing.T) {


Could we add a new test creating a server with a CMK, and then (in a second update) changing just the tags? That would catch the KeyId bug above/ensure that's fixed

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T15:29:04Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_database_resource.go

+			if props.MaxSizeBytes != nil {
+				d.Set("max_size_gb", int32((*props.MaxSizeBytes)/int64(1073741824)))
+			}


We should be able to make this:

Suggested change

if props.MaxSizeBytes != nil {

d.Set("max_size_gb", int32((*props.MaxSizeBytes)/int64(1073741824)))

}

maxSizeGb := 0

if props.MaxSizeBytes != nil {

maxSizeGb = *props.MaxSizeBytes/int64(1073741824)

}

d.Set("max_size_gb", maxSizeGb)

No, actually we can't, else the compiler complains cannot use *props.MaxSizeBytes / int64(1073741824) (value of type int64) as int value in assignmentcompiler

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T15:33:06Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_database_resource.go

-	return tags.FlattenAndSet(d, resp.Tags)
+	d.Set("transparent_data_encryption_enabled", tdeState)
+
+	return tags.FlattenAndSet(d, resp.Model.Tags)


we can move this up:

Suggested change

return tags.FlattenAndSet(d, resp.Model.Tags)

return nil

internal/services/mssql/mssql_database_resource.go

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T15:48:45Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_resource.go

-
-	t := d.Get("tags").(map[string]interface{})
-	metadata := tags.Expand(t)
+	if model := existing.Model; model != nil {


since we're nil-checking this below/relying on this having a value - we can remove this if statement:

Suggested change

if model := existing.Model; model != nil {

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-14T15:50:49Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_resource.go

+		future, err := client.CreateOrUpdate(ctx, *id, payload)
+		if err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("issuing update request for %s: %+v", id, err)
 		}

-		return fmt.Errorf("waiting for update of %s: %+v", id.String(), err)
-	}
+		if err = future.Poller.PollUntilDone(ctx); err != nil {
+			if response.WasConflict(future.HttpResponse) {
+				return fmt.Errorf("SQL Server names need to be globally unique and %q is already in use", id.ServerName)
+			}

-	d.SetId(id.ID())
+			return fmt.Errorf("waiting for update of %s: %+v", pointer.From(id), err)
+		}


since this is an Update, the SQL Server name will already be reserved, so I think we should be able to reduce this too:

Suggested change

future, err := client.CreateOrUpdate(ctx, *id, payload)

if err != nil {

return fmt.Errorf("issuing update request for %s: %+v", id, err)

}

return fmt.Errorf("waiting for update of %s: %+v", id.String(), err)

}

if err = future.Poller.PollUntilDone(ctx); err != nil {

if response.WasConflict(future.HttpResponse) {

return fmt.Errorf("SQL Server names need to be globally unique and %q is already in use", id.ServerName)

}

d.SetId(id.ID())

return fmt.Errorf("waiting for update of %s: %+v", pointer.From(id), err)

}

future, err := client.CreateOrUpdateThenPoll(ctx, *id, payload)

if err != nil {

return fmt.Errorf("issuing update request for %s: %+v", id, err)

}

WodansSon · 2023-11-18T06:17:55Z

These tests are also failing in main...

tombuildsstuff

A couple of minor comments but this otherwise LGTM 👍

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-21T11:39:26Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_database_resource.go

+			if props.RequestedBackupStorageRedundancy != nil {
+				d.Set("storage_account_type", string(pointer.From(props.RequestedBackupStorageRedundancy)))
+			}


Looks like this one is still pending?

tombuildsstuff · 2023-11-21T11:48:28Z

internal/services/mssql/mssql_server_resource.go

+		// NOTE: In the new API this just a string instead of a *string, shouldn't we just call Normalize?
+		d.Set("location", location.NormalizeNilable(pointer.To(model.Location)))


indeed, this can become:

Suggested change

// NOTE: In the new API this just a string instead of a *string, shouldn't we just call Normalize?

d.Set("location", location.NormalizeNilable(pointer.To(model.Location)))

d.Set("location", location.Normalize(model.Location))

tombuildsstuff

Thanks for pushing those changes @WodansSon - this LGTM 👍

<Actions> <action id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8"> <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3> <details id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24"> <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary> <p>"hashicorp/azurerm" updated from "3.81.0" to "3.82.0" in file ".terraform.lock.hcl"</p> <details> <summary>3.82.0</summary> <pre>Changelog retrieved from:
	https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.82.0
FEATURES:

* New Data Source: `azurerm_monitor_workspace` ([#23928](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23928 New Resource: `azurerm_application_load_balancer_subnet_association` ([#23628](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23628))

ENHANCEMENTS:

* dependencies: updating to `v0.20231117.1130141` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#23945](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23945 `azurestackhci`: updating to API Version `2023-08-01` ([#23939](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23939 `dashboard`: updating to API Version `2023-09-01` ([#23929](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23929 `hpccache`: updating to API version `2023-05-01` ([#24005](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24005 `mssql`: updating resources using `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` to API Version `2023-02-01-preview` ([#23721](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23721 `templatespecversions`: updating to API Version `2022-02-01` ([#24007](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24007 Data Source: `azurerm_template_spec_version` - refactoring to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#24007](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24007 `azurerm_cosmosdb_postgresql_cluster` - `coordinator_storage_quota_in_mb` and `coordinator_vcore_count` are no longer required for read replicas ([#23928](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23928 `azurerm_dashboard_grafana` - `sku` can now be set to `Essential` ([#23934](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23934 `azurerm_gallery_application_version` - add support for the `config_file`, `package_file` and `target_region.exclude_from_latest` properties ([#23816](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23816 `azurerm_hdinsight_hadoop_cluster` - `script_actions` is no longer Force New ([#23888](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23888 `azurerm_hdinsight_hbase_cluster` - `script_actions` is no longer Force New ([#23888](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23888 `azurerm_hdinsight_interactive_query_cluster` - `script_actions` is no longer Force New ([#23888](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23888 `azurerm_hdinsight_kafka_cluster` - `script_actions` is no longer Force New ([#23888](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23888 `azurerm_hdinsight_spark_cluster` - `script_actions` is no longer Force New ([#23888](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23888 `azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - add support for the `gpu_instance` property ([#23887](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23887 `azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool` - add support for the `gpu_instance` property ([#23887](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23887 `azurerm_log_analytics_workspace` - add support for the `identity` property ([#23864](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23864 `azurerm_linux_function_app` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23638](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23638 `azurerm_linux_function_app_slot` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23638](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23638 `azurerm_managed_lustre_file_system` - export attribute `mgs_address` ([#23942](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23942 `azurerm_mssql_database` - support for Hyperscale SKUs ([#23974](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23974 `azurerm_mssql_database` - refactoring to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#23721](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23721 `azurerm_mssql_server` - refactoring to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#23721](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23721 `azurerm_shared_image` - add support for `trusted_launch_supported` ([#23781](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23781 `azurerm_spring_cloud_container_deployment` - add support for the `application_performance_monitoring_ids` property ([#23862](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23862 `azurerm_spring_cloud_customized_accelerator` - add support for the `accelerator_type` and `path` properties ([#23797](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23797 `azurerm_point_to_site_vpn_gateway` - allow multiple `connection_configurations` blocks ([#23936](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23936 `azurerm_private_dns_cname_record` - `ttl` can now be set to 0 ([#23918](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23918 `azurerm_windows_function_app` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23638](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23638 `azurerm_windows_function_app_slot` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23638](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23638))

BUG FIXES:
* `azurerm_api_management` - correct a bug with additional location zones within the `additional_location` block ([#23943](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23943 `azurerm_dev_test_linux_virtual_machine` - `storage_type` is now ForceNew to match the updated API behaviour ([#23973](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23973 `azurerm_dev_test_windows_virtual_machine` - `storage_type` is now ForceNew to match the updated API behaviour ([#23973](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23973 `azurerm_disk_encryption_set` - resource will recreate if `identity` changes from `SystemAssigned` to `UserAssigned` ([#23904](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23904 `azurerm_eventhub_cluster`: `sku_name` is no longer ForceNew ([#24009](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24009 `azurerm_firewall` - recasing the value for `firewall_policy_id` to workaround the API returning the incorrect casing ([#23993](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23993 `azurerm_security_center_subscription_pricing` - fix a bug preventing removal of `extensions` and downgrading `tier` to `Free` ([#23821](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23821 `azurerm_windows_web_app` - fix an issue of incorrect application stack settings during update ([#23372](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23372))


</pre> </details> </details> <a href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/terraform-jobs/job/azure/job/main/896/">Jenkins pipeline link</a> </action> </Actions> --- <table> <tr> <td width="77"> <img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli logo" width="50" height="50"> </td> <td> <p> Created automatically by <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a> </p> <details><summary>Options:</summary> <br /> <p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its manifest(s)</a>.</p> <ul> <li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen it, the next time it runs.</li> <li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li> </ul> <p> Feel free to report any issues at <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br /> If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on our <a href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>! </p> </details> </td> </tr> </table> Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <[email protected]>

github-actions · 2024-05-06T02:08:25Z

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

Initial Check-in...

f3a1560

WodansSon added dependencies service/mssql Microsoft SQL Server labels Oct 28, 2023

WodansSon marked this pull request as draft October 28, 2023 03:24

github-actions bot added size/XL waiting-response labels Oct 28, 2023

Adding AAD clients...

67d3d6a

github-actions bot added waiting-response and removed waiting-response labels Oct 28, 2023

Adding restorableDroppedDatabasesClient....

7f7d80f

github-actions bot added waiting-response and removed waiting-response labels Oct 28, 2023

WodansSon changed the title ~~azurerm_mssql_server - upgrade mssql server from v5.0/sql to 2023-02-01-preview/servers and 2023-02-01-preview/serverconnectionpolicies~~ azurerm_mssql_server - upgrade mssql server from v5.0/sql to 2023-02-01-preview Oct 28, 2023

Check-in progress...

0bc8f6c

github-actions bot added waiting-response and removed waiting-response labels Oct 29, 2023

Checking-in progrss...

6adf29b

github-actions bot added waiting-response and removed waiting-response labels Oct 29, 2023

Update internal clients...

50beff6

github-actions bot removed the waiting-response label Oct 30, 2023

WodansSon changed the title ~~azurerm_mssql_server - upgrade mssql server from v5.0/sql to 2023-02-01-preview~~ azurerm_mssql_server - upgrade from v5.0/sql to 2023-02-01-preview Oct 30, 2023

WodansSon added 3 commits October 30, 2023 18:59

Fix tags...

48e721c

Fix azuread_administrator update logic...

34941b2

fix go lang error msg capitalization violations...

800ce59

github-actions bot added the waiting-response label Oct 31, 2023

Remove superfluous subscriptionId declarations...

e67614f

github-actions bot added waiting-response and removed waiting-response labels Oct 31, 2023

Fix linting error...

5501102

WodansSon added 3 commits November 8, 2023 19:07

Fixed FindDatabaseReplicationPartners for new API

b53005b

Fix Elastic Pool read...

1400bba

Fix MinCapacity and TDE for new API...

aafc1a0

tombuildsstuff mentioned this pull request Nov 9, 2023

Support for new features available for SQL Database Elastic Job Agent (Preview) #23841

Open

1 task

Update to match old behaviors so tests will pass

56f0ae7

tombuildsstuff suggested changes Nov 14, 2023

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot added the waiting-response label Nov 14, 2023

Address most of the new PR comments...

7866c4c

github-actions bot removed the waiting-response label Nov 15, 2023

WodansSon added 3 commits November 16, 2023 01:02

Address the remaining PR comments...

c66ed82

Add test case to validate CMK tag updates...

04967b0

Revert FindDatabaseReplicationPartners to use Resources API...

f8e71eb

tombuildsstuff approved these changes Nov 21, 2023

View reviewed changes

Address the last two PR comments...

3369ae1

github-actions bot added the waiting-response label Nov 22, 2023

tombuildsstuff approved these changes Nov 23, 2023

View reviewed changes

tombuildsstuff removed the waiting-response label Nov 23, 2023

tombuildsstuff added this to the v3.82.0 milestone Nov 23, 2023

tombuildsstuff removed their assignment Nov 23, 2023

tombuildsstuff merged commit c39b06e into main Nov 23, 2023
23 checks passed

tombuildsstuff deleted the e_sql_upgrade_deux branch November 23, 2023 08:16

opentofu-provider-sync-service-account pushed a commit to opentofu/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2023

updating to include hashicorp#23721

f83272a

tombuildsstuff mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2023

resourcemanager/pollers: updating LRO Pollers to also check the provisioningState / resource existence hashicorp/go-azure-sdk#307

Open

strakh-alex mentioned this pull request Dec 18, 2023

mssql_database creation fails when there is a policy which checks transparent data encryption #24253

Closed

1 task

katbyte mentioned this pull request Feb 13, 2024

Support for Azure SQL Database Geo-Zone-Redundant Backup Storage #19542

Closed

1 task

github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 6, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

`azurerm_mssql_server` and `azurerm_mssql_database` - upgrade from `v5.0/sql` to `2023-02-01-preview` #23721

`azurerm_mssql_server` and `azurerm_mssql_database` - upgrade from `v5.0/sql` to `2023-02-01-preview` #23721

WodansSon commented Oct 28, 2023 •

edited

Loading

WodansSon commented Nov 13, 2023

tombuildsstuff left a comment

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

WodansSon Nov 16, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 14, 2023

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

WodansSon commented Nov 18, 2023

tombuildsstuff left a comment

tombuildsstuff Nov 21, 2023

tombuildsstuff Nov 21, 2023

WodansSon Nov 22, 2023

tombuildsstuff left a comment

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2024

		if d.HasChange("key_vault_key_id") {
		keyVaultKeyId := d.Get(("transparent_data_encryption_key_vault_key_id")).(string)

		// NOTE: In the new API this just a string instead of a *string, shouldn't we just call Normalize?
		d.Set("location", location.NormalizeNilable(pointer.To(model.Location)))

	// NOTE: In the new API this just a string instead of a *string, shouldn't we just call Normalize?
	d.Set("location", location.NormalizeNilable(pointer.To(model.Location)))
	d.Set("location", location.Normalize(model.Location))

azurerm_mssql_server and azurerm_mssql_database - upgrade from v5.0/sql to 2023-02-01-preview #23721

azurerm_mssql_server and azurerm_mssql_database - upgrade from v5.0/sql to 2023-02-01-preview #23721

Conversation

WodansSon commented Oct 28, 2023 • edited Loading

WodansSon commented Nov 13, 2023

tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

WodansSon commented Nov 18, 2023

tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented May 6, 2024

`azurerm_mssql_server` and `azurerm_mssql_database` - upgrade from `v5.0/sql` to `2023-02-01-preview` #23721

`azurerm_mssql_server` and `azurerm_mssql_database` - upgrade from `v5.0/sql` to `2023-02-01-preview` #23721

WodansSon commented Oct 28, 2023 •

edited

Loading

WodansSon Nov 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading