-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule
- correctly handle default rule
#22806
azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule
- correctly handle default rule
#22806
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Requires Import is a core feature of the provider which works around an issue in the Azure API where the user specified name is the unique identifier - as such it needs to be present in every resource otherwise this'd mean that we'd end up unintentionally adopting configured Tag Rules. Instead, since this resource always exists - we can fix this by updating the Requires Import check to confirm if there's any Tag Rules configured (i.e. not the default) and then raise the "requires import" error here - can we update this to handle that?
Thanks!
existing, err := client.TagRulesGet(ctx, id) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
if !response.WasNotFound(existing.HttpResponse) { | ||
return fmt.Errorf("checking for an existing %s: %+v", id, err) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
if !response.WasNotFound(existing.HttpResponse) { | ||
return tf.ImportAsExistsError("azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule", id.ID()) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a core behavioural feature of the provider, so we shouldn't be requiring the requiredImports
check, instead we can update it to confirm if this is configured with the default settings, and raise the requiredImports
error if so - can we update this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I updated the code to check if the "Tag Rule" exists or the "Tag Rule" is with default settings.
Service team confirmed that below behaviors are expected.
- Datadog Monitor Tag Rule only allows name "default".
- For the completely new Datadog Monitor, there is no existing Datadog Monitor Tag Rule under it.
- For the recreated Datadog Monitor with same name, there always is an existing default Datadog Monitor Tag Rule under it.
- Service API doesn't support to delete existing Datadog Monitor Tag Rule.
func TestAccDatadogMonitorTagRules_requiresImport(t *testing.T) { | ||
data := acceptance.BuildTestData(t, "azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule", "test") | ||
r := TagRulesDatadogMonitorResource{} | ||
r.populateFromEnvironment(t) | ||
data.ResourceTest(t, r, []acceptance.TestStep{ | ||
{ | ||
Config: r.basic(data), | ||
Check: acceptance.ComposeTestCheckFunc( | ||
check.That(data.ResourceName).ExistsInAzure(r), | ||
), | ||
}, | ||
data.RequiresImportErrorStep(r.requiresImport), | ||
}) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we revert this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reverted it.
func (r TagRulesDatadogMonitorResource) requiresImport(data acceptance.TestData) string { | ||
return fmt.Sprintf(` | ||
%s | ||
|
||
resource "azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule" "import" { | ||
datadog_monitor_id = azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule.test.datadog_monitor_id | ||
name = azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule.test.name | ||
log { | ||
subscription_log_enabled = true | ||
} | ||
metric { | ||
filter { | ||
name = "Test" | ||
value = "Testing-Logs" | ||
action = "Include" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
`, r.basic(data)) | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we revert this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reverted it.
return fmt.Sprintf(` | ||
provider "azurerm" { | ||
features {} | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these should be specified in each test, can we revert this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It has been defined in template func.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
provider
blocks should not be defined in the template function and should be specified in each test - can we revert this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Currently, in main branch, provider block is defined in both template function and each test. So I assume this is a bug. So I removed provider block from template function otherwise test case would fail.
if name := input.Name; name != nil && *input.Name == "default" { | ||
if props := input.Properties; props != nil { | ||
logRules := props.LogRules | ||
metricRules := props.MetricRules | ||
|
||
if logRules != nil && metricRules != nil { | ||
if (logRules.SendAadLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendAadLogs) && (logRules.SendSubscriptionLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendSubscriptionLogs) && (logRules.SendResourceLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendResourceLogs) && (logRules.FilteringTags != nil && len(*logRules.FilteringTags) == 0) && (metricRules.FilteringTags != nil && len(*metricRules.FilteringTags) == 0) { | ||
return true | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can simplify this by shifting left, for example:
if name := input.Name; name != nil && *input.Name == "default" { | |
if props := input.Properties; props != nil { | |
logRules := props.LogRules | |
metricRules := props.MetricRules | |
if logRules != nil && metricRules != nil { | |
if (logRules.SendAadLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendAadLogs) && (logRules.SendSubscriptionLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendSubscriptionLogs) && (logRules.SendResourceLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendResourceLogs) && (logRules.FilteringTags != nil && len(*logRules.FilteringTags) == 0) && (metricRules.FilteringTags != nil && len(*metricRules.FilteringTags) == 0) { | |
return true | |
} | |
} | |
} | |
} | |
if input.Name == nil || strings.EqualsFold(*input.Name, "default") { | |
return false | |
} | |
if input.Properties == nil || input.Properties.LogRules == nil || input.Properties.MetricRules == nil { | |
return false | |
} | |
logRules := input.Properties.LogRules | |
metricRules := input.Properties.MetricRules | |
result := logRules.SendAadLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendAadLogs) && | |
(logRules.SendSubscriptionLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendSubscriptionLogs) && | |
(logRules.SendResourceLogs != nil && !*logRules.SendResourceLogs) && | |
(logRules.FilteringTags != nil && len(*logRules.FilteringTags) == 0) && | |
(metricRules.FilteringTags != nil && len(*metricRules.FilteringTags) == 0) | |
return result |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated
return fmt.Sprintf(` | ||
provider "azurerm" { | ||
features {} | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
provider
blocks should not be defined in the template function and should be specified in each test - can we revert this?
@tombuildsstuff ,thanks for the comment. I updated PR. Please take another look. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @neil-yechenwei - One comment to take a look at below, and then I think this should be good to merge.
Thanks
if input.Name == nil || !strings.EqualFold(*input.Name, "default") { | ||
return false | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be removed? The name
property defaults to default
, so could have other settings that have changed thus making this an incorrect assumption?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. It is removed.
Hi @jackofallops ,thanks for the comment. I updated PR. Please take another look. Thanks. All related test cases passed after rerun. |
azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule
- correctly handle default rule
<Actions> <action id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8"> <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3> <details id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24"> <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary> <p>"hashicorp/azurerm" updated from "3.82.0" to "3.83.0" in file ".terraform.lock.hcl"</p> <details> <summary>3.83.0</summary> <pre>Changelog retrieved from:
	https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.83.0
UPGRADE NOTES

* Key Vaults are now loaded using [the `ListBySubscription` API within the Key Vault Resource Provider](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/keyvault/keyvault/vaults/list-by-subscription?view=rest-keyvault-keyvault-2022-07-01&tabs=HTTP) rather than [the Resources API](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/keyvault/keyvault/vaults/list?view=rest-keyvault-keyvault-2022-07-01&tabs=HTTP). This change means that the Provider now caches the list of Key Vaults available within a Subscription, rather than loading these piecemeal to workaround stale data returned from the Resources API ([#24019](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24019))

FEATURES:

* New Data Source: `azurerm_stack_hci_cluster` ([#24032](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24032))

ENHANCEMENTS:

* dependencies: updating to `v0.20231129.1103252` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#24063](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24063 `automation`: updating to API Version `2023-11-01` ([#24017](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24017 `keyvault`: the cache is now populated using the `ListBySubscription` endpoint on the KeyVault Resource Provider rather than via the `Resources` API ([#24019](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24019 `keyvault`: updating the cache to populate all Key Vaults available within the Subscription to reduce the number of API calls ([#24019](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24019 Data Source `azurerm_private_dns_zone`: refactoring to use the `ListBySubscription` API rather than the Resources API when `resource_group_name` is omitted ([#24024](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24024 `azurerm_dashboard_grafana` - support for `grafana_major_version` ([#24014](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24014 `azurerm_linux_web_app` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23893](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23893 `azurerm_linux_web_app_slot` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23893](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23893 `azurerm_media_transform` - deprecate `face_detector_preset` and `video_analyzer_preset` ([#24002](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24002 `azurerm_postgresql_database` - update the validation of `collation` to include `Norwegian_Norway.1252` ([#24070](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24070 `azurerm_postgresql_flexible_server` - updating to API Version `2023-06-01-preview` ([#24016](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24016 `azurerm_redis_cache` - support for the `active_directory_authentication_enabled` property ([#23976](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23976 `azurerm_windows_web_app` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23893](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23893 `azurerm_windows_web_app_slot` - add support for dotnet 8 ([#23893](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23893 `azurerm_storage_account` - add `name` validation in custom diff ([#23799](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23799))

BUG FIXES:

* authentication: fix a bug where auxiliary tenants were not correctly authorized ([#24063](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24063 `azurerm_app_configuration` - normalize location in `replica` block ([#24074](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24074 `azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - cosmosdb version and capabilities can now be updated at the same time ([#24029](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24029 `azurerm_data_factory_flowlet_data_flow` - `source` and `sink` properties are now optional ([#23987](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23987 `azurerm_datadog_monitor_tag_rule` - correctly handle default rule ([#22806](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#22806 `azurerm_ip_group`: fixing a crash when `firewall_ids` and `firewall_policy_ids` weren't parsed correctly from the API Response ([#24031](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24031 `azurerm_nginx_deployment` - add default value of `20` for `capacity` ([#24033](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24033))


</pre> </details> <details> <summary>3.84.0</summary> <pre>Changelog retrieved from:
	https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.84.0
FEATURES:

* **New Data Source:** `azurerm_storage_containers` ([#24061](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24061 **New Resource:** `azurerm_elastic_san` ([#23619](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23619 **New Resource:** `azurerm_key_vault_managed_hardware_security_module_role_assignment` ([#22332](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#22332 **New Resource:** `azurerm_key_vault_managed_hardware_security_module_role_definition` ([#22332](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22332))

ENHANCEMENTS:

* dependencies: updating mssql elasticpools from `v5.0` to `2023-05-01-preview`
* dependencies: updating to `v0.20231207.1122031` of `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` ([#24149](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24149 Data Source: `azurerm_storage_account` - export the primary and secondary internet and microsoft hostnames for blobs, dfs, files, queues, tables and web ([#23517](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23517 Data Source: `azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - export the `connection_strings`, `primary_sql_connection_string`, `secondary_sql_connection_string`, `primary_readonly_sql_connection_string`, `secondary_readonly_sql_connection_string`, `primary_mongodb_connection_string`, `secondary_mongodb_connection_string`, `primary_readonly_mongodb_connection_string`, and `secondary_readonly_mongodb_connection_string` attributes ([#24129](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24129 `azurerm_bot_service_azure_bot` - support for the `public_network_access_enabled` property ([#24125](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24125 `azurerm_container_app_environment` - support for the `workload_profile` property ([#23478](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23478 `azurerm_cosmosdb_cassandra_datacenter` - support for the `seed_node_ip_addresses` property ([#24076](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24076 `azurerm_firewall` - support for the `dns_proxy_enabled` property ([#20519](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#20519 `azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - support for the `support_plan` property and the `sku_tier` `Premium` ([#23970](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23970 `azurerm_mssql_database` - support for `enclave_type` field ([#24054](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24054 `azurerm_mssql_elasticpool` - support for `enclave_type` field ([#24054](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24054 `azurerm_mssql_managed_instance` - support for more `vcores`: `6`, `10`, `12`, `20`, `48`, `56`, `96`, `128` ([#24085](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24085 `azurerm_redis_linked_server` - support for the property `geo_replicated_primary_host_name` ([#23984](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23984 `azurerm_storage_account` - expose the primary and secondary internet and microsoft hostnames for blobs, dfs, files, queues, tables and web ([#23517](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23517 `azurerm_synapse_role_assignment` - support for the `principal_type` property ([#24089](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24089 `azurerm_spring_cloud_build_deployment` - support for the `application_performance_monitoring_ids` property ([#23969](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23969 `azurerm_virtual_network_gateway` - support for the `bgp_route_translation_for_nat_enabled`, `dns_forwarding_enabled`, `ip_sec_replay_protection_enabled`, `remote_vnet_traffic_enabled`, `virtual_wan_traffic_enabled`, `radius_server`, `virtual_network_gateway_client_connection`, `policy_group`, and `ipsec_policy` property ([#23220](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23220))

BUG FIXES:

* `azurerm_application_insights_api_key` - prevent a bug where multiple keys couldn't be created for an Application Insights instance ([#23463](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23463 `azurerm_container_registry` - the `network_rule_set.virtual_network` property has been deprecated ([#24140](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24140 `azurerm_hdinsight_hadoop_cluster` - set `roles.edge_node.install_script_action.parameters` into state by retrieving the value provided in the user config since this property isn't returned by the API ([#23971](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23971 `azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - prevent a bug where maintenance window start date was always recalculated and sent to the API ([#23985](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#23985 `azurerm_mssql_database` - will no longer send all long retention values in payload unless set ([#24124](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24124 `azurerm_mssql_managed_database` - will no longer send all long retention values in payload unless set ([#24124](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24124 `azurerm_mssql_server_microsoft_support_auditing_policy` - only include storage endpoint in payload if set ([#24122](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24122 `azurerm_mobile_network_packet_core_control_plane` - prevent a panic if the HTTP Response is nil ([#24083](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24083 `azurerm_storage_account` - revert plan time name validation `(#23799)` ([#24142](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#24142 `azurerm_web_application_firewall_policy` - split create and update function to fix lifecycle - ignore changes ([#23412](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23412))


</pre> </details> </details> <a href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/terraform-jobs/job/azure/job/main/931/">Jenkins pipeline link</a> </action> </Actions> --- <table> <tr> <td width="77"> <img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli logo" width="50" height="50"> </td> <td> <p> Created automatically by <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a> </p> <details><summary>Options:</summary> <br /> <p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its manifest(s)</a>.</p> <ul> <li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen it, the next time it runs.</li> <li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li> </ul> <p> Feel free to report any issues at <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br /> If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on our <a href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>! </p> </details> </td> </tr> </table> --------- Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damien Duportal <[email protected]>
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions. |
fixes #22793
As datadog monitor tag rule is always there, so we don't need to check if it exists.
--- PASS: TestAccDatadogMonitorTagRules_basic (221.01s)
--- PASS: TestAccDatadogMonitorTagRules_update (340.70s)
--- PASS: TestAccDatadogMonitorTagRules_requiresImport (237.15s)