Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_logic_app_workflow added logicapp name validation #9282

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2020

Conversation

ritesh-modi
Copy link
Contributor

image

@ghost ghost added the size/XS label Nov 12, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ritesh-modi - This LGTM 👍

@jackofallops
Copy link
Member

tests passing:
image

@jackofallops jackofallops changed the title added logicapp name validation azurerm_logic_app_workflow added logicapp name validation Nov 12, 2020
@jackofallops jackofallops merged commit 1fb8eb7 into hashicorp:master Nov 12, 2020
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 12, 2020

This has been released in version 2.36.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.36.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 12, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 12, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants