-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added new 0.1 version to WAF managed_rule_set to support Microsoft_BotManagerRuleSet creation #7579
Conversation
…tManagerRuleSet creation in tf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hey @wlodekj
Thanks for this PR :)
Taking a look through this mostly LGTM - if we can add 1.0
back in then this otherwise LGTM 👍
Thanks!
Hey @tombuildsstuff, Reverted back 1.0 and update docs. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM - thanks for pushing those changes @wlodekj
This has been released in version 2.18.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.18.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
Hey,
This is my first PR here. I wanted to fix an issue with Microsoft_BotManagerRuleSet version 0.1 not being supported in azurerm_web_application_firewall_policy.managed_rules.managed_rule_set. Currently accepted version numbers are:
It looks like a Microsoft thing - they have recently changed version 1.0 to 0.1... Added 0.1 version and updated doc files. Not sure if this validation makes sense here, maybe it's better to provide just a full rule name without type and version and be less strict about it?
Thanks,
Jakub