-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use_32_bit_worker_process doesn't work #3146
Comments
I am not familiar with this azure resource but from looking at the code:
Are you able to create † Found this comment in the terraform schema code from which I am making this assertion:
|
@Lucretius - Not sure this is exactly related to this issue, but I had a challenge with this attribute where I had an App Service Plan in Standard tier with an application within it that had The Terraform plan was generated fine, showing both resources changing, but when I applied I got an error because the App Service Plan was attempted to be changed first, which put it in an incompatible mode so the operation failed. It should have sequenced it the other way around: update the App Service to |
@bojingo thank you for the additional information here, it's really helpful. It sounds like we want to make the |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
Community Note
Terraform (and AzureRM Provider) Version
Affected Resource(s)
azurerm_app_service
,azurerm_app_service_slot
Expected Behavior
use_32_bit_worker_process = true
(which, BTW, worked at some point)use_32_bit_worker_process = true
switches the app service's platform to 64 Bit given it was set to 32 bit.Actual Behavior
Nothing happens in the scenarios mentioned above
Steps to Reproduce
terraform apply
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: