Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

increase max capacity for eventhub namespaces to 100 #3049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2019

Conversation

ljmsc
Copy link
Contributor

@ljmsc ljmsc commented Mar 14, 2019

I increased the max capacity of event namespaces. The actual limit is 100 if you contact the azure support.

@ghost ghost added the size/XS label Mar 14, 2019
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @ljmsc,

Thank you for the PR! LGTM 🚀

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v1.24.0 milestone Mar 14, 2019
@katbyte katbyte merged commit 2a34f9c into hashicorp:master Mar 14, 2019
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 3, 2019

This has been released in version 1.24.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
	version = "~> 1.24.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 14, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants