Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New resource] azurerm_machine_learning_workspace_network_outbound_rule_fqdn #27384

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

Add support for Machine Learning Workspace Network Outbound Rule FQDN:

  • FQDN (azurerm_machine_learning_workspace_network_outbound_rule_fqdn)
  • Service Tag
  • Private Endpoint
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic (551.62s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update (660.47s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/machinelearning       662.982s

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_resource - support for the thing1 property [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like some test failures
'
image

@xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor Author

@katbyte test fixed

=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_requiresImport (541.75s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_basic (554.67s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleFqdn_update (926.93s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/machinelearning       942.843s

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ❄️

resource "azurerm_machine_learning_workspace_network_outbound_rule_fqdn" "example" {
name = "example-outboundrule"
workspace_id = azurerm_machine_learning_workspace.example.id
destination = "destination"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is supposed to be a FQDN?

Suggested change
destination = "destination"
destination = "example.com"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated


* `workspace_id` - (Required) Specifies the ID of the Machine Learning Workspace. Changing this forces a new resource to be created.

* `destination` - (Required) Specifies the fully qualified domain name to allow for outbound traffic.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be

Suggested change
* `destination` - (Required) Specifies the fully qualified domain name to allow for outbound traffic.
* `destination_fqdn` - (Required) Specifies the fully qualified domain name to allow for outbound traffic.

as it is a FQDN?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated

"destination": {
Type: pluginsdk.TypeString,
Required: true,
ValidateFunc: validation.StringIsNotEmpty,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we be validating this is a FQDN?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no restriction on FQDN in the portal, as long as it is a string, checking that the string should not be empty is enough

@xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor Author

@katbyte All updated
image

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks LGTM 🦅

@katbyte katbyte merged commit a63f29e into hashicorp:main Oct 29, 2024
35 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.8.0 milestone Oct 29, 2024
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants