Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VMSS - Support updating zones #27288

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

ms-zhenhua
Copy link
Contributor

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua commented Sep 5, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

Support updating zones field in azurerm_linux_virtual_machine_scale_set, azurerm_orchestrated_virtual_machine_scale_set and azurerm_windows_virtual_machine_scale_set.

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

image

--- PASS: TestAccOrchestratedVirtualMachineScaleSet_zoneUpdate (342.49s)
--- PASS: TestAccWindowsVirtualMachineScaleSet_scalingZonesUpdate (940.20s)
--- PASS: TestAccLinuxVirtualMachineScaleSet_scalingZonesUpdate (1305.01s)
PASS
ok github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/compute 1340.901s

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • VMSS - Support updating zones

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@ms-zhenhua ms-zhenhua marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2024 08:37
Copy link
Member

@mbfrahry mbfrahry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ms-zhenhua, thanks for this! Just updating the wording on the docs and wondering if we need to do the third test step for this change

* `zones` - (Optional) Specifies a list of Availability Zones in which this Linux Virtual Machine Scale Set should be located. Changing this forces a new Linux Virtual Machine Scale Set to be created.
* `zones` - (Optional) Specifies a list of Availability Zones in which this Linux Virtual Machine Scale Set should be located.

-> **Note:** Removing existing zones from existing Virtual Machine Scale Set is currently not supported.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
-> **Note:** Removing existing zones from existing Virtual Machine Scale Set is currently not supported.
-> **Note:** Updating `zones` to remove an existing zone forces a new Virtual Machine Scale Set to be created.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated. Thanks.

* `zones` - (Optional) Specifies a list of Availability Zones across which the Virtual Machine Scale Set will create instances. Changing this forces a new Virtual Machine Scale Set to be created.
* `zones` - (Optional) Specifies a list of Availability Zones across which the Virtual Machine Scale Set will create instances.

-> **Note:** Removing existing zones from existing Virtual Machine Scale Set is currently not supported.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
-> **Note:** Removing existing zones from existing Virtual Machine Scale Set is currently not supported.
-> **Note:** Updating `zones` to remove an existing zone forces a new Virtual Machine Scale Set to be created.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated. Thanks.

* `zones` - (Optional) Specifies a list of Availability Zones in which this Windows Virtual Machine Scale Set should be located. Changing this forces a new Windows Virtual Machine Scale Set to be created.
* `zones` - (Optional) Specifies a list of Availability Zones in which this Windows Virtual Machine Scale Set should be located.

-> **Note:** Removing existing zones from existing Virtual Machine Scale Set is currently not supported.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
-> **Note:** Removing existing zones from existing Virtual Machine Scale Set is currently not supported.
-> **Note:** Updating `zones` to remove an existing zone forces a new Virtual Machine Scale Set to be created.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated. Thanks.

},
data.ImportStep("admin_password"),
{
Config: r.scalingZonesSingle(data),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is that we can add new zones but can't remove existing zones, so will this step recreate the resource? If so, we shouldn't have this step

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're correct. It will recreate the resource. I have removed this step. Thanks.

),
},
{
Config: r.singleZone(data),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is that we can add new zones but can't remove existing zones, so will this step recreate the resource? If so, we shouldn't have this step

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're correct. It will recreate the resource. I have removed this step. Thanks.

},
data.ImportStep("admin_password"),
{
Config: r.scalingZonesSingle(data),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My understanding is that we can add new zones but can't remove existing zones, so will this step recreate the resource? If so, we shouldn't have this step

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're correct. It will recreate the resource. I have removed this step. Thanks.

@ms-zhenhua
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @mbfrahry,

Thank you for your review. I have updated the code. Please kindly take another review.

@fitzgeraldsteele
Copy link
Contributor

👍🏾

@fitzgeraldsteele
Copy link
Contributor

@mbfrahry thanks for the review! Please let us know if there are any issues remaining! Would love to make the deployment train this week

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🍒

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 9c2cc02 into hashicorp:main Sep 19, 2024
39 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.3.0 milestone Sep 19, 2024
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants