Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_postgresql_flexible_server - support for auto_grow_enabled #23069

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 26, 2023

Conversation

neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor

@neil-yechenwei neil-yechenwei commented Aug 24, 2023

image
image

Copy link
Collaborator

@WodansSon WodansSon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @neil-yechenwei, this LGTM but do these also need to be exposed in the data source as well .\internal\services\postgres\postgresql_flexible_server_data_source.go?

@neil-yechenwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

@WodansSon , thanks for the comment. I added it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🐌

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 8ec6784 into hashicorp:main Aug 26, 2023
23 checks passed
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.72.0 milestone Aug 26, 2023
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 16, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants