r/aws_s3_bucket_object: Add support for S3 Object Lock legal holds

[ewbankkit]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Now that S3 buckets support Amazon S3 Object Lock (#6634 & #6872), add support for S3 object legal holds to the aws_s3_bucket_object resource and data source.

[ewbankkit]

Related:

• r/aws_s3_bucket_object: Add support for S3 Object Lock retention modes and periods #7159

[ewbankkit]

Suggested syntax:

resource "aws_s3_bucket_object" "foo" {
  bucket = "my-versioning-bucket"
  key    = "important-data.txt"

  legal_hold {
    status = "ON"
  }
}

[ewbankkit]

With the new PR I am going with a simplified syntax that is more in line with the S3 API:

resource "aws_s3_bucket_object" "example" {
  object_lock_legal_hold_status = "ON"
}

[nywilken]

The enhancement to the aws_s3_bucket_object resource has been merged and will be released with version 2.29.0 of the Terraform AWS provider.

[ghost]

This has been released in version 2.29.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks!

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!