(feat): add port parameter in aws_redshiftserverless_workgroup

[EttoreFoti]

Description

This adds the capability to define a custom port when creating a redshift workgroup.
The data is then taken from endpoint["port"] as reference.

Relations

Closes #32249

References

Resolve enhancement request #32249

Output from Acceptance Testing

❯ make testacc TESTARGS="-run=TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port\|TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic" PKG=redshiftserverless
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/redshiftserverless/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20  -run=TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port\|TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port (464.81s)
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic (595.57s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/redshiftserverless 597.797s

...

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

[github-actions]

Welcome @EttoreFoti 👋

It looks like this is your first Pull Request submission to the Terraform AWS Provider! If you haven’t already done so please make sure you have checked out our CONTRIBUTOR guide and FAQ to make sure your contribution is adhering to best practice and has all the necessary elements in place for a successful approval.

Also take a look at our FAQ which details how we prioritize Pull Requests for inclusion.

Thanks again, and welcome to the community! 😃

[nam054]

LGTM! 🚀 @EttoreFoti Thank you for your contribution!

> make testacc TESTARGS="-run=TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port\|TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic" PKG=redshiftserverless
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/redshiftserverless/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20  -run=TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port\|TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic
=== RUN   TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port
=== PAUSE TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic
=== CONT  TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroup_port (258.70s)
--- PASS: TestAccRedshiftServerlessWorkgroupDataSource_basic (265.99s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/redshiftserverless 269.503s

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v5.32.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.