You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the long term, I'm a little worried about starting a go routine for every volume. It seems at least possible that some operators could set us up for more goroutines than we want running for these, maybe in a followup if warranted we could use a fixed pool?
For large clusters with many volumes we could end up with a lot of extra running goroutines. We could reduce this with a fixed pool. But we may also be able to simply Stop() the watch goroutine when we've completed processing an incoming update, when we've determined either there are no more past claims to process or no more claims at all).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.
In #7794, @langmartin pointed out:
For large clusters with many volumes we could end up with a lot of extra running goroutines. We could reduce this with a fixed pool. But we may also be able to simply
Stop()
the watch goroutine when we've completed processing an incoming update, when we've determined either there are no more past claims to process or no more claims at all).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: