Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nomad UI requires direct client access #3497

Closed
holtwilkins opened this issue Nov 3, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Nomad UI requires direct client access #3497

holtwilkins opened this issue Nov 3, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@holtwilkins
Copy link
Contributor

Nomad version

0.7.0

Issue

The Nomad web UI, when attempting to view a particular client as in the ui/nodes/<node ID> UI endpoint, attempts to reach-out to that client directly on port 4646.

Expected Behavior

Although running the Nomad CLI also attempts to reach-out directly to nodes, I would expect that the server (via the UI) would be intended to be treated as a proxy, so to speak, for accessing information like this on clients. I.e. I would expect that direct access to all Nomad client API endpoints from all human clients shouldn't be a requirement from a network perspective.

@dadgar
Copy link
Contributor

dadgar commented Nov 3, 2017

For the time being this is as designed. It is using the same API's as the CLI so the experience will be the same for both of them. This may change in the future.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2022

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 6, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants