Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CSI: handle per-alloc volumes in alloc status -verbose CLI #12573

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2022

Conversation

tgross
Copy link
Member

@tgross tgross commented Apr 14, 2022

While walking @philrenaud thru #11965 I realized that we have the exact same problem in the CLI. 🤦

The Nomad client's csi_hook interpolates the alloc suffix with the
volume request's name for CSI volumes with per_alloc = true, turning
example into example[1]. We need to do this same behavior in the
alloc status output so that we show the correct volume.

The Nomad client's `csi_hook` interpolates the alloc suffix with the
volume request's name for CSI volumes with `per_alloc = true`, turning
`example` into `example[1]`. We need to do this same behavior in the
`alloc status` output so that we show the correct volume.
Copy link
Contributor

@lgfa29 lgfa29 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just missing a changelog entry 👍

@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport/1.1.x backport to 1.1.x release line backport/1.2.x backport to 1.1.x release line
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants