You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would just use Consul DNS on its default port, and use dnsmasq or otherwise to bind to different ports that forwards it upstream to the single Consul DNS port :) less complexity in Consul and more flexibility in how it actually works for you
Going to close this one out - agree with @jippi that there are other ways to implement this, and it hasn't been a common request. It's definitely good to keep Consul config complexity down if possible, and addresses and ports are already very complex to configure.
consul version
for both Client and ServerClient:
0.6.4
Server:
0.6.4
consul info
for both Client and ServerClient:
Server:
Operating system and Environment details
Linux version 3.10.0-327.18.2.el7.x86_64 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Fri Apr 8 05:09:53 EDT 2016
Description of the Issue (and unexpected/desired result)
I've got this in my
settings.json
I want to do this:
because we have limited IP range connectivity, but I want to keep the standard port as well.
My question is: Can I have multiple ports listening for dns?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: