Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify use of MaybePartial #1253

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2022
Merged

Simplify use of MaybePartial #1253

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 21, 2022

Conversation

hannobraun
Copy link
Owner

From a commit message:

Now that all implementations of HasPartial have been integrated into the centralized object storage, the previous irregularity that required us to specify the Handle explicitly, is no longer there.

I'm about to make some changes that will remove `MaybePartial`'s ability
to support this `Copy`. It wasn't useful anyway, as none of the possible
`T`s were `Copy` in the first place.
Now that all implementations of `HasPartial` have been integrated into
the centralized object storage, the previous irregularity that required
us to specify the `Handle` explicitly, is no longer there.
@hannobraun hannobraun enabled auto-merge October 21, 2022 14:15
@hannobraun hannobraun merged commit 21d7fa2 into main Oct 21, 2022
@hannobraun hannobraun deleted the partial branch October 21, 2022 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant