You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi! Thanks for you code! This repo doesn't provided detailed hyper-parameters (i.e, crf_t, alpha) when applying dCRF to the pseudo CAM label, can you provide them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We conducted an experiment for comparing the performance of pseudo-masks. We also observed the performance when applying dCRF. We tested various CRF hyper-parameters based on the previous papers and chose them with the best performance. We referred to the official code/paper of DeepLab, PSA(https://github.com/jiwoon-ahn/psa), and OAA.
The difference in the performance according to the hyper-parameters among the papers is not that big, but not negligible.
Finally, we chose the hyper-parameters of DeepLab-V2 (ResNet101-based) for dCRF in the experiments. Please see the website of DeepLabV2 for them. By the way, the hyper-parameters are different according to the backbone network in the official DeepLab code.
If you have any question, please leave an issue here :)
Hi! Thanks for you code! This repo doesn't provided detailed hyper-parameters (i.e, crf_t, alpha) when applying dCRF to the pseudo CAM label, can you provide them?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: